Department of HIV Medicine, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK.
AIDS. 2011 Aug 24;25(13):1671-3. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32834a1cd6.
There have been no data presented on the relative rates of the development of renal stones in those receiving ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (ATZ/r) when compared with other commonly used antiretrovirals (ARVs). We compared the rate of development of renal stones in a cohort of HIV-infected individuals attending the Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Foundation Trust exposed to ATZ/r with those exposed to efavirenz (EFV)/ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r) and ritonavir-boosted darunavir (DRV/r) over a 45-month study period. The rate of development of renal stones in the ATZ/r group (n = 1206) compared with the EFV/LPV/r/DRV/r combined group (n = 4449) was 7.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.7-10.8] per 1000 patient-years and 1.9 (95% CI 1.2-2.8) per 1000 patient-years (P < 0.001), respectively. The renal stones rate remained significantly higher in the ATZ/r group after adjusting for prior ATZ/r/indinavir (IND) exposure. When choosing a boosted protease inhibitor, ATZ/r renal stones should be considered as a potential comorbidity.
尚未有数据表明与其他常用抗逆转录病毒药物(ARV)相比,接受利托那韦增强阿扎那韦(ATZ/r)治疗的患者发生肾结石的相对风险。我们比较了在切尔西和威斯敏斯特医院基金会信托基金会就诊的 HIV 感染个体中,暴露于 ATZ/r 的个体与暴露于依非韦伦(EFV)/利托那韦增强洛匹那韦(LPV/r)和利托那韦增强达芦那韦(DRV/r)的个体的肾结石发展率,研究期间为 45 个月。ATZ/r 组(n = 1206)与 EFV/LPV/r/DRV/r 联合组(n = 4449)的肾结石发展率分别为 7.3 [95%置信区间(CI)4.7-10.8]/1000 患者年和 1.9(95%CI 1.2-2.8)/1000 患者年(P<0.001)。在调整先前的 ATZ/r/茚地那韦(IND)暴露后,ATZ/r 组的肾结石发生率仍明显更高。在选择增强型蛋白酶抑制剂时,应将 ATZ/r 肾结石视为潜在的合并症。