Kimball Rebecca T, Mary Colette M St, Braun Edward L
Department of Biology, University of Florida, P.O. Box 118525, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Int J Evol Biol. 2011;2011:423938. doi: 10.4061/2011/423938. Epub 2011 May 2.
Traits involved in sexual signaling are ubiquitous among animals. Although a single trait appears sufficient to convey information, many sexually dimorphic species exhibit multiple sexual signals, which may be costly to signalers and receivers. Given that one signal may be enough, there are many microevolutionary hypotheses to explain the evolution of multiple signals. Here we extend these hypotheses to a macroevolutionary scale and compare those predictions to the patterns of gains and losses of sexual dimorphism in pheasants and partridges. Among nine dimorphic characters, including six intersexual signals and three indicators of competitive ability, all exhibited both gains and losses of dimorphism within the group. Although theories of intersexual selection emphasize gain and elaboration, those six characters exhibited greater rates of loss than gain; in contrast, the competitive traits showed a slight bias towards gains. The available models, when examined in a macroevolutionary framework, did not yield unique predictions, making it difficult to distinguish among them. Even with this limitation, when the predictions of these alternative models were compared with the heterogeneous patterns of evolution of dimorphism in phasianids, it is clear that many different selective processes have been involved in the evolution of sexual signals in this group.
参与性信号传递的特征在动物中普遍存在。尽管单一特征似乎足以传达信息,但许多两性异形物种表现出多种性信号,这对信号发送者和接收者来说可能代价高昂。鉴于一个信号可能就足够了,有许多微观进化假说来解释多种信号的进化。在这里,我们将这些假说扩展到宏观进化尺度,并将这些预测与雉鸡和鹧鸪两性异形的获得与丧失模式进行比较。在九个二态性状中,包括六个两性间信号和三个竞争能力指标,所有性状在该类群中都表现出两性异形的获得与丧失。尽管两性间选择理论强调获得和细化,但这六个性状的丧失率高于获得率;相比之下,竞争性状则略微偏向于获得。在宏观进化框架中审视现有模型时,并未得出独特的预测结果,因此难以区分这些模型。即便存在这一局限性,当将这些替代模型的预测与雉科动物两性异形的异质进化模式进行比较时,很明显,该类群中性信号的进化涉及许多不同的选择过程。