McMaster Development Consultants Ltd, Glasgow, UK.
Eur J Health Econ. 2012 Dec;13(6):801-9. doi: 10.1007/s10198-011-0335-x. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
Golimumab is a novel TNF-α inhibitor licensed to treat patients with active PsA. Although its clinical efficacy has been proven in clinical trials, its cost effectiveness is yet to be established.
To estimate the cost effectiveness of golimumab among patients with active PsA from the UK NHS perspective.
A decision analytic model was used to simulate progression of a hypothetical cohort of active PsA patients on golimumab and other TNF-α inhibitors as well as palliative care. The clinical evidence was derived from clinical trials of TNF-α inhibitors and compared using mixed treatment models. The primary outcome measure was quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) estimated based on change in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) from baseline. The annual acquisition cost of golimumab was assumed to be identical to annual cost of other subcutaneous TNF-α inhibitors. The resource use costs and outcomes were discounted at 3.5% over a period of 40 years. The uncertainty surrounding important variables was further explored using probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA).
TNF-α inhibitors were significantly superior to palliative care but comparable to each other on Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC), HAQ and PASI response. The incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICERs) for golimumab compared to palliative care was £16,811 for PsA patients and £16,245 for a subgroup of PsA patients with significant psoriasis. At an acceptability threshold of £30,000 per QALY, the probability of golimumab being cost effective is 89%.
Once monthly, golimumab is a cost-effective treatment alternative for patients with active PsA. With its patient-focussed attributes, golimumab is likely to offer additional choice in PsA treatment.
戈利木单抗是一种新型 TNF-α 抑制剂,获许可用于治疗活动性银屑病关节炎患者。虽然其临床疗效已在临床试验中得到证实,但仍需确定其成本效益。
从英国国家医疗服务体系的角度评估戈利木单抗治疗活动性银屑病关节炎患者的成本效益。
采用决策分析模型模拟一组假设的活动性银屑病关节炎患者接受戈利木单抗和其他 TNF-α 抑制剂以及姑息治疗的进展情况。临床证据来源于 TNF-α 抑制剂的临床试验,并通过混合治疗模型进行比较。主要结局指标是根据基线时健康评估问卷(HAQ)和银屑病面积严重程度指数(PASI)的变化来估计的质量调整生命年(QALY)。戈利木单抗的年获得成本被假定与其他皮下 TNF-α 抑制剂的年成本相同。资源使用成本和结果在 40 年内以 3.5%的贴现率进行贴现。使用概率敏感性分析(PSA)进一步探讨了重要变量的不确定性。
TNF-α 抑制剂在银屑病关节炎反应标准(PsARC)、HAQ 和 PASI 反应方面显著优于姑息治疗,但彼此之间相当。与姑息治疗相比,戈利木单抗的增量成本效益比(ICER)在所有患者中为 16811 英镑,在有显著银屑病的亚组患者中为 16245 英镑。在接受阈值为 30000 英镑/QALY 的情况下,戈利木单抗具有成本效益的概率为 89%。
对于活动性银屑病关节炎患者,每月一次的戈利木单抗是一种具有成本效益的治疗选择。由于其以患者为中心的特点,戈利木单抗可能在银屑病关节炎治疗中提供更多的选择。