University of Wisconsin Colleges – Philosophy, 518 South 7th Avenue, Wausau, Wisconsin 54403, United States.
Bioethics. 2013 Jan;27(1):12-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01891.x. Epub 2011 Jul 4.
Recent advances in reprogramming technology do not bypass the ethical challenge of embryo sacrifice. Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPS) research has been and almost certainly will continue to be conducted within the context of embryo sacrifice. If human embryos have moral status as human beings, then participation in iPS research renders one morally complicit in their destruction; if human embryos have moral status as mere precursors of human beings, then advocacy of iPS research policy that is inhibited by embryo sacrifice concerns renders one morally complicit in avoidable harms to persons. Steps may be taken to address these complicity concerns, but in the final analysis there is no alternative to achieving clarity with respect to the moral status of the human embryo.
最近在重编程技术方面的进展并没有回避胚胎牺牲的伦理挑战。诱导多能干细胞(iPS)研究已经并几乎可以肯定将继续在胚胎牺牲的背景下进行。如果人类胚胎具有作为人类的道德地位,那么参与 iPS 研究就使人们在道德上对他们的毁灭负有责任;如果人类胚胎仅仅作为人类的前体具有道德地位,那么倡导受胚胎牺牲限制的 iPS 研究政策就使人们在道德上对可避免的对人的伤害负有责任。可以采取措施来解决这些连带责任问题,但归根结底,要明确人类胚胎的道德地位,别无选择。