• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单脐动脉在双胎妊娠中的表现。

Single umbilical artery in twin pregnancies.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Neue Frauenklinik Luzern, Luzern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012 May;39(5):505-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.9085.

DOI:10.1002/uog.9085
PMID:21728208
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to evaluate the antenatal incidence of single umbilical artery (SUA) in twin pregnancies according to chorionicity and to assess its relationship with outcome.

METHODS

Consecutive twin pregnancies undergoing ultrasound evaluation at our institutions were included. A targeted sonographic evaluation of the umbilical cord and vessels was performed in all cases. Chorionicity was determined according to standard ultrasound criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 174 twin pregnancies, 100 dichorionic (DC) and 74 monochorionic (MC), were included in the study. An SUA was identified in 17 (9.8%) pregnancies, and in 18 (5.2%) fetuses. No difference was found in the incidence of SUA in DC and MC twins. Among affected pregnancies, all but one DC twin pregnancy were discordant for SUA. Structural and/or chromosomal abnormalities were present in 27.8% of fetuses with SUA. The prevalence of small-for-gestational-age fetuses and of discordant birth weight (> 20% discordance) was higher in the SUA group than in the rest of the population, although these differences were not statistically significant. Twin pairs discordant for SUA had significantly higher weight discordance than those with normal umbilical cords. The sonographic cross-sectional area of the SUA did not appear to show the typical adaptive dilatation usually seen in singleton pregnancies with SUA.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of SUA in twins is higher than in singletons, with no difference between MC and DC twins. Intrapair discordance for SUA in identical twins provides evidence against an exclusively genetic origin of this anomaly. The apparent failure of compensatory dilatation of the umbilical artery in twins with SUA may explain in part the higher risk for fetal growth restriction in these cases.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估根据绒毛膜性评估双胎妊娠中单脐动脉(SUA)的产前发生率,并评估其与结局的关系。

方法

连续纳入在本机构行超声检查的双胎妊娠。所有病例均行脐带及血管的靶向超声检查。绒毛膜性根据标准超声标准确定。

结果

本研究共纳入 174 例双胎妊娠,100 例双绒毛膜性(DC)和 74 例单绒毛膜性(MC)。发现 17 例(9.8%)妊娠和 18 例(5.2%)胎儿存在 SUA。DC 和 MC 双胎妊娠的 SUA 发生率无差异。在受影响的妊娠中,除 1 例 DC 双胎妊娠外,其余均为 SUA 不一致。SUA 胎儿中存在结构和/或染色体异常的比例为 27.8%。SUA 组胎儿小于胎龄儿和双胎体重差异(>20%差异)的发生率高于其余人群,但差异无统计学意义。SUA 不一致的双胎对体重差异明显大于脐带正常的双胎。SUA 的超声横截面积似乎没有表现出通常在 SUA 单胎妊娠中见到的典型适应性扩张。

结论

双胎妊娠 SUA 的发生率高于单胎妊娠,MC 和 DC 双胎妊娠之间无差异。同卵双胞胎之间的 SUA 不一致为该异常的遗传起源提供了证据。SUA 双胞胎中脐动脉代偿性扩张的明显失败可能部分解释了这些情况下胎儿生长受限的风险增加。

相似文献

1
Single umbilical artery in twin pregnancies.单脐动脉在双胎妊娠中的表现。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012 May;39(5):505-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.9085.
2
Twin pregnancies discordant for single umbilical artery.单脐动脉不一致的双胎妊娠。
J Reprod Med. 2013 May-Jun;58(5-6):241-5.
3
The incidence of isolated single umbilical artery in twins and adverse pregnancy outcomes.双胞胎中孤立性单脐动脉的发生率与不良妊娠结局。
Prenat Diagn. 2013 Mar;33(3):269-72. doi: 10.1002/pd.4057. Epub 2013 Jan 27.
4
Outcomes of an isolated single umbilical artery in singleton pregnancy: a large study from the Middle East and Gulf region.孤立性单脐动脉在 singleton 妊娠中的结局:来自中东和海湾地区的一项大型研究。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Dec;171(2):277-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.09.028. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
5
Increased latency of absent end-diastolic flow in the umbilical artery of monochorionic twin fetuses.单绒毛膜双胎胎儿脐动脉舒张末期血流缺失的延迟增加。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jul;26(1):44-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.1900.
6
Isolated single umbilical artery: evaluating the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome.孤立性单脐动脉:评估不良妊娠结局的风险
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Jan;184:80-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.11.007. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
7
Outcome of monochorionic twin pregnancy with selective intrauterine growth restriction according to umbilical artery Doppler flow pattern of smaller twin: systematic review and meta-analysis.根据较小双胞胎的脐动脉多普勒血流模式评估单绒毛膜双胎妊娠选择性宫内生长受限的结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;50(5):559-568. doi: 10.1002/uog.17362.
8
Monochorionic diamniotic infants without twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome.无双胎输血综合征的单绒毛膜双羊膜囊婴儿。
J Perinatol. 2005 Dec;25(12):753-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211405.
9
Twin pregnancy with two live fetuses at 11-13 weeks: effect of one fetal death on pregnancy outcome.11-13 周双胎妊娠且存活两胎儿:一胎死亡对妊娠结局的影响。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;55(4):482-488. doi: 10.1002/uog.21925. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
10
Weight discordance and perinatal mortality in twin pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis.双胎妊娠体质量差异与围产儿死亡:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;52(1):11-23. doi: 10.1002/uog.18966.

引用本文的文献

1
The Umbilical Cord and Complications of Twin Gestations.脐带与双胎妊娠并发症
Matern Fetal Med. 2022 Sep 27;4(4):276-285. doi: 10.1097/FM9.0000000000000173. eCollection 2022 Oct.
2
Prevalence of single umbilical artery, clinical outcomes and its risk factors: A cross-sectional study.单脐动脉的患病率、临床结局及其危险因素:一项横断面研究。
Int J Reprod Biomed. 2021 Jun 23;19(5):441-448. doi: 10.18502/ijrm.v19i5.9253. eCollection 2021 May.
3
Double inferior vena cava in a monochorionic twin pregnancy with selective fetal growth restriction.
单绒毛膜性双胎妊娠一胎选择性胎儿生长受限合并双下腔静脉
BMJ Case Rep. 2021 Mar 10;14(3):e240379. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2020-240379.
4
Isolated single umbilical artery in twin pregnancies and its adverse pregnancy outcomes - a case report and review of literature.双胎妊娠中孤立性单脐动脉及其不良妊娠结局——1例病例报告并文献复习
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Jan;9(1):AD01-4. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/10669.5439. Epub 2015 Jan 1.
5
The incidence of isolated single umbilical artery in twins and adverse pregnancy outcomes.双胞胎中孤立性单脐动脉的发生率与不良妊娠结局。
Prenat Diagn. 2013 Mar;33(3):269-72. doi: 10.1002/pd.4057. Epub 2013 Jan 27.