Luo Li-Shi, Liao Wei, Chen Xingwang, Peng Yan, Zhang Wei
Department of Mathematics & Statistics and Center for Computational Sciences Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia 23529, USA.
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2011 May;83(5 Pt 2):056710. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.83.056710. Epub 2011 May 26.
We conduct a comparative study to evaluate several lattice Boltzmann (LB) models for solving the near incompressible Navier-Stokes equations, including the lattice Boltzmann equation with the multiple-relaxation-time (MRT), the two-relaxation-time (TRT), the single-relaxation-time (SRT) collision models, and the entropic lattice Boltzmann equation (ELBE). The lid-driven square cavity flow in two dimensions is used as a benchmark test. Our results demonstrate that the ELBE does not improve the numerical stability of the SRT or the lattice Bhatnagar-Gross-Krook (LBGK) model. Our results also show that the MRT and TRT LB models are superior to the ELBE and LBGK models in terms of accuracy, stability, and computational efficiency and that the ELBE scheme is the most inferior among the LB models tested in this study, thus is unfit for carrying out numerical simulations in practice. Our study suggests that, to optimize the accuracy, stability, and efficiency in the MRT model, it requires at least three independently adjustable relaxation rates: one for the shear viscosity ν (or the Reynolds number Re), one for the bulk viscosity ζ, and one to satisfy the criterion imposed by the Dirichlet boundary conditions which are realized by the bounce-back-type boundary conditions.
我们进行了一项比较研究,以评估几种用于求解近不可压缩纳维-斯托克斯方程的格子玻尔兹曼(LB)模型,包括具有多松弛时间(MRT)、双松弛时间(TRT)、单松弛时间(SRT)碰撞模型的格子玻尔兹曼方程,以及熵格子玻尔兹曼方程(ELBE)。二维方腔顶盖驱动流被用作基准测试。我们的结果表明,ELBE并没有提高SRT或格子 Bhatnagar-Gross-Krook(LBGK)模型的数值稳定性。我们的结果还表明,MRT和TRT LB模型在精度、稳定性和计算效率方面优于ELBE和LBGK模型,并且ELBE方案在本研究测试的LB模型中是最次的,因此不适合在实际中进行数值模拟。我们的研究表明,为了在MRT模型中优化精度、稳定性和效率,至少需要三个独立可调的松弛率:一个用于剪切粘度ν(或雷诺数Re),一个用于体粘度ζ,一个用于满足由通过反弹型边界条件实现的狄利克雷边界条件所施加的准则。