• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2 型糖尿病合并症患者的病例管理效果;CasCo 研究。一项随机对照试验的设计。

The effectiveness of case management for comorbid diabetes type 2 patients; the CasCo study. Design of a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, P.O. Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Fam Pract. 2011 Jul 5;12:68. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-12-68.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2296-12-68
PMID:21729265
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3142502/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

More than half of the patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients are diagnosed with one or more comorbid disorders. They can participate in several single-disease oriented disease management programs, which may lead to fragmented care because these programs are not well prepared for coordinating care between programs. Comorbid patients are therefore at risk for suboptimal treatment, unsafe care, inefficient use of health care services and unnecessary costs. Case management is a possible model to counteract fragmented care for comorbid patients. It includes evidence-based optimal care, but is tailored to the individual patients' preferences.The objective of this study is to examine the effectiveness of a case management program, in addition to a diabetes management program, on the quality of care for comorbid T2DM patients.

METHODS/DESIGN: The study is a randomized controlled trial among patients with T2DM and at least one comorbid chronic disease (N=230), who already participate in a diabetes management program. Randomization will take place at the level of the patients in general practices. Trained practice nurses (case managers) will apply a case management program in addition to the diabetes management program. The case management intervention is based on the Guided Care model and includes six elements; assessing health care needs, planning care, create access to other care providers and community resources, monitoring, coordinating care and recording of all relevant information. Patients in the control group will continue their participation in the diabetes management program and receive care-as-usual from their general practitioner and other care providers.

DISCUSSION

We expect that the case management program, which includes better structured care based on scientific evidence and adjusted to the patients' needs and priorities, will improve the quality of care coordination from both the patients' and caregivers' perspective and will result in less consumption of health care services.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Netherlands Trial Register (NTR): NTR1847.

摘要

背景

超过一半的 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者被诊断出患有一种或多种合并症。他们可以参加多个单一疾病导向的疾病管理计划,但由于这些计划在协调计划之间的护理方面准备不足,可能会导致护理碎片化。因此,合并症患者面临治疗效果不佳、护理不安全、医疗服务使用效率低下和不必要的成本增加的风险。病例管理是一种可能的模式,可以对抗合并症患者的碎片化护理。它包括基于证据的最佳护理,但针对患者个体的偏好进行调整。本研究的目的是检验病例管理计划除了糖尿病管理计划外,对合并 T2DM 患者护理质量的影响。

方法/设计:该研究是一项针对已经参加糖尿病管理计划的 T2DM 患者和至少一种合并慢性疾病患者(N=230)的随机对照试验。随机化将在一般实践层面的患者中进行。经过培训的实践护士(病例管理员)将在糖尿病管理计划之外应用病例管理计划。病例管理干预措施基于指导护理模式,包括六个要素;评估医疗保健需求、规划护理、为其他护理提供者和社区资源创造途径、监测、协调护理和记录所有相关信息。对照组患者将继续参加糖尿病管理计划,并接受他们的家庭医生和其他护理提供者的常规护理。

讨论

我们预计,病例管理计划将改善患者和护理人员的护理协调质量,并减少医疗服务的消耗,因为该计划包括基于科学证据的结构化程度更高的护理,并根据患者的需求和优先级进行调整。

试验注册

荷兰试验注册(NTR):NTR1847。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/3142502/a7126cc96706/1471-2296-12-68-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/3142502/a7126cc96706/1471-2296-12-68-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/3142502/a7126cc96706/1471-2296-12-68-1.jpg

相似文献

1
The effectiveness of case management for comorbid diabetes type 2 patients; the CasCo study. Design of a randomized controlled trial.2 型糖尿病合并症患者的病例管理效果;CasCo 研究。一项随机对照试验的设计。
BMC Fam Pract. 2011 Jul 5;12:68. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-12-68.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Case management for patients with poorly controlled diabetes: a randomized trial.血糖控制不佳的糖尿病患者的病例管理:一项随机试验。
Am J Med. 2004 Jun 1;116(11):732-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.11.028.
4
Effectiveness of the cardiac-diabetes transcare program: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.心脏糖尿病综合护理项目的有效性:一项随机对照试验方案
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb 2;17(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2043-4.
5
6
Cluster randomized controlled trial of a peer support program for people with diabetes: study protocol for the Australasian Peers for Progress study.一项针对糖尿病患者同伴支持计划的整群随机对照试验:澳大拉西亚同伴进步研究的研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Oct 4;12:843. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-843.
7
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
8
Cardiovascular risk outcome and program evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial of a community-based, lay peer led program for people with diabetes.一项针对糖尿病患者的社区基层同伴主导项目的整群随机对照试验的心血管风险结果与项目评估
BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 24;16(1):864. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3538-3.
9
The CareWell-primary care program: design of a cluster controlled trial and process evaluation of a complex intervention targeting community-dwelling frail elderly.关爱健康初级保健项目:一项以社区居住的虚弱老年人为目标的复杂干预措施的集群对照试验设计和过程评估。
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Dec 5;13:115. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-115.
10
Effectiveness of a self-management intervention with personalised genetic and lifestyle-related risk information on coronary heart disease and diabetes-related risk in type 2 diabetes (CoRDia): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.一项针对2型糖尿病患者冠心病和糖尿病相关风险的自我管理干预措施,结合个性化遗传和生活方式相关风险信息的效果(CoRDia):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Dec 2;16:547. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1073-7.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Payment Reforms on the Quality and Utilisation of Healthcare for Patients With Multimorbidity: A Systematic Review.支付改革对患有多种疾病患者的医疗质量和利用情况的影响:一项系统评价
Int J Integr Care. 2022 Feb 10;22(1):10. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5937. eCollection 2022 Jan-Mar.
2
Interventions for improving outcomes in patients with multimorbidity in primary care and community settings.在初级保健和社区环境中改善多种疾病患者结局的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 15;1(1):CD006560. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006560.pub4.
3
Mortality and Cardiovascular Complications in Older Complex Chronic Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

本文引用的文献

1
[Multimorbidity and comorbidity in the Dutch population--data from general practices].[荷兰人群中的多重疾病和共病——来自全科医疗的数据]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2011;155:A3193.
2
Improving chronic care: the "guided care" model.改善慢性病护理:“引导式护理”模式。
Perm J. 2008 Winter;12(1):50-4. doi: 10.7812/TPP/07-014.
3
The effects of guided care on the perceived quality of health care for multi-morbid older persons: 18-month outcomes from a cluster-randomized controlled trial.引导式护理对多病老年患者感知医疗质量的影响:一项基于群组随机对照试验的 18 个月随访结果
老年复杂慢性 2 型糖尿病患者的死亡率和心血管并发症。
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:6078498. doi: 10.1155/2017/6078498. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
4
Integrating Undergraduate Patient Partners into Diabetes self-management education: Evaluating a free clinic pilot program for the Underserved.将本科患者伙伴纳入糖尿病自我管理教育:评估一项针对弱势群体的免费诊所试点项目。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2016;27(4):1689-1708. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2016.0156.
5
Interventions for improving outcomes in patients with multimorbidity in primary care and community settings.改善基层医疗和社区环境中患有多种疾病患者预后的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 14;3(3):CD006560. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006560.pub3.
6
Stakeholders' perception on the organization of chronic care: a SWOT analysis to draft avenues for health care reforms.利益相关者对慢性病护理组织的看法:一项用于起草医疗改革途径的SWOT分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Apr 18;14:179. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-179.
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Mar;25(3):235-42. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1192-5. Epub 2009 Dec 22.
4
['Consumer quality'-index 'General practice care' measures patients' experiences and compares general practices with each other].“消费者质量”指数“全科医疗护理”衡量患者的体验,并对各全科医疗进行相互比较。
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2009;153:A180.
5
Guided care and the cost of complex healthcare: a preliminary report.指导式护理与复杂医疗保健的成本:初步报告。
Am J Manag Care. 2009 Aug;15(8):555-9.
6
Effects of self-monitoring of glucose in non-insulin treated patients with type 2 diabetes: design of the IN CONTROL-trial.非胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者自我血糖监测的效果:IN CONTROL试验设计
BMC Fam Pract. 2009 Apr 27;10:26. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-26.
7
Disease management for patients with type 2 diabetes: towards patient empowerment.2型糖尿病患者的疾病管理:迈向患者赋权
Int J Integr Care. 2008;8:e69. doi: 10.5334/ijic.257. Epub 2008 Oct 22.
8
Early effects of "Guided Care" on the quality of health care for multimorbid older persons: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.“引导式护理”对多病共存老年人医疗保健质量的早期影响:一项整群随机对照试验
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2008 Mar;63(3):321-7. doi: 10.1093/gerona/63.3.321.
9
Guided care: cost and utilization outcomes in a pilot study.引导式护理:一项试点研究中的成本与使用结果
Dis Manag. 2008 Feb;11(1):29-36. doi: 10.1089/dis.2008.111723.
10
A pilot test of the effect of guided care on the quality of primary care experiences for multimorbid older adults.一项关于引导式护理对多病共存老年人初级护理体验质量影响的试点测试。
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 May;23(5):536-42. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0529-9. Epub 2008 Feb 12.