Suppr超能文献

阻生智齿

Impacted wisdom teeth.

作者信息

Dodson Thomas B, Susarla Srinivas M

机构信息

Harvard School of Dental Medicine and Centre for Applied Clinical Investigation Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Clin Evid. 2010 Apr 8;2010:1302.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of impacted wisdom teeth is high, with some 72% of Swedish people aged 20 to 30 years having at least one impacted third molar. Impacted wisdom teeth occur because of a lack of space, obstruction, or abnormal position, and can cause inflammatory dental disease manifested by pain and swelling of infected teeth and may destroy adjacent teeth and bone.

METHODS AND OUTCOMES

We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: Should asymptomatic and disease-free impacted wisdom teeth be removed prophylactically? What are the effects of different surgical methods of removing impacted wisdom teeth? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to July 2009 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically, please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.

RESULTS

We found 25 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: prophylactic extraction, active surveillance, and different surgical methods of removing impacted wisdom teeth.

摘要

引言

阻生智齿的发生率很高,约72%的20至30岁瑞典人至少有一颗阻生第三磨牙。阻生智齿的出现是由于空间不足、阻塞或位置异常,可导致炎症性牙病,表现为患牙疼痛和肿胀,还可能破坏相邻牙齿和骨质。

方法与结果

我们进行了一项系统评价,旨在回答以下临床问题:无症状且无疾病的阻生智齿是否应预防性拔除?拔除阻生智齿的不同手术方法有何效果?我们检索了:截至2009年7月的Medline、Embase、Cochrane图书馆及其他重要数据库(Clinical Evidence综述会定期更新,请查看我们的网站获取本综述的最新版本)。我们纳入了来自美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)和英国药品及医疗保健产品监管局(MHRA)等相关组织的危害警示。我们对干预措施的证据质量进行了GRADE评估。

结果

我们发现25项系统评价、随机对照试验或观察性研究符合我们的纳入标准。

结论

在本系统评价中,我们提供了以下干预措施的有效性和安全性相关信息:预防性拔除、主动监测以及拔除阻生智齿的不同手术方法。

相似文献

1
Impacted wisdom teeth.阻生智齿
BMJ Clin Evid. 2010 Apr 8;2010:1302.
2
Impacted wisdom teeth.
BMJ Clin Evid. 2008 May 23;2008:1302.
4
Impacted wisdom teeth.阻生智齿
BMJ Clin Evid. 2014 Aug 29;2014:1302.
5
Antibiotics to prevent complications following tooth extractions.预防拔牙后并发症的抗生素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11:CD003811. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003811.pub2.
9
Perineal care.会阴护理。
BMJ Clin Evid. 2011 Apr 11;2011:1401.
10
Perineal care.会阴护理。
BMJ Clin Evid. 2008 Sep 24;2008:1401.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Progress in evidence-based medicine.循证医学的进展。
JAMA. 2008 Oct 15;300(15):1814-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.300.15.1814.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验