• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较精神病高危青年与非临床队列的压力体验和应对方式。

Comparison of experiences of stress and coping between young people at risk of psychosis and a non-clinical cohort.

机构信息

University of Melbourne, Psychological Sciences, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Behav Cogn Psychother. 2012 Jan;40(1):69-88. doi: 10.1017/S1352465811000397. Epub 2011 Jul 5.

DOI:10.1017/S1352465811000397
PMID:21729339
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although the experience of stress and associated coping responses are thought to play a role in the onset of schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, there is little empirical evidence to support such a relationship. The relatively recent development of validated and reliable criteria for identifying young people at "ultra" high-risk (UHR) of psychosis has enabled the process of illness onset to be studied more closely than was previously possible.

METHOD

This longitudinal study compared the experiences of stress and coping between a UHR cohort (N=143) and a healthy comparison group (HC group, N=32).

RESULTS

The UHR group experienced significantly fewer life events over a 12-month period than the HC group, but there was no difference in the experience of minor events or "hassles". However, the UHR group reported feeling significantly more distressed by events, felt they coped more poorly and utilized different coping strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

The appraisals made about stressors differentiated the groups and was associated with differences in coping and distress levels. This suggests that treatment strategies focusing on stress management and enhancing coping skills might be important components of preventive interventions.

摘要

背景

尽管压力经历和相关应对反应被认为在精神分裂症和其他精神病障碍的发病中起作用,但几乎没有经验证据支持这种关系。最近制定了用于识别处于精神病“超高风险”(UHR)的年轻人的经过验证和可靠的标准,使疾病发病过程的研究比以前更加深入。

方法

这项纵向研究比较了 UHR 队列(N=143)和健康对照组(HC 组,N=32)之间的压力和应对经验。

结果

在 12 个月的时间内,UHR 组经历的生活事件明显少于 HC 组,但经历的小事件或“麻烦”没有差异。然而,UHR 组报告说,他们对事件感到更加痛苦,感觉自己的应对能力更差,并且使用了不同的应对策略。

结论

对压力源的评估将两组区分开来,并与应对和困扰水平的差异相关。这表明,侧重于压力管理和增强应对技能的治疗策略可能是预防干预的重要组成部分。

相似文献

1
Comparison of experiences of stress and coping between young people at risk of psychosis and a non-clinical cohort.比较精神病高危青年与非临床队列的压力体验和应对方式。
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2012 Jan;40(1):69-88. doi: 10.1017/S1352465811000397. Epub 2011 Jul 5.
2
Experience of trauma and conversion to psychosis in an ultra-high-risk (prodromal) group.创伤经历与超高危(前驱期)人群精神分裂症转化。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2010 May;121(5):377-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2010.01542.x. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
3
Randomized controlled trial of interventions for young people at ultra-high risk of psychosis: study design and baseline characteristics.针对超高风险精神病青少年的干预措施随机对照试验:研究设计与基线特征
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2009 Sep;43(9):818-29. doi: 10.1080/00048670903107625.
4
Progressive gray matter reduction of the superior temporal gyrus during transition to psychosis.在向精神病转变过程中颞上回灰质的进行性减少。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009 Apr;66(4):366-76. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.12.
5
Randomized controlled trial of interventions for young people at ultra high risk for psychosis: 6-month analysis.随机对照试验研究针对极可能出现精神病的年轻人的干预措施:6 个月分析。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Apr;72(4):430-40. doi: 10.4088/JCP.08m04979ora. Epub 2010 Oct 19.
6
White-matter markers for psychosis in a prospective ultra-high-risk cohort.前瞻性超高危队列研究中的精神病性症状的脑白质标记物。
Psychol Med. 2010 Aug;40(8):1297-304. doi: 10.1017/S0033291709991711. Epub 2009 Nov 9.
7
Coping strategies and their relationship to psychopathologies in people at ultra high-risk for psychosis and with schizophrenia.精神病超高风险人群和精神分裂症患者的应对策略及其与精神病理学的关系。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2011 Feb;199(2):106-10. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3182083b96.
8
Stress and HPA-axis functioning in young people at ultra high risk for psychosis.处于超高精神病风险的年轻人的压力与下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺(HPA)轴功能
J Psychiatr Res. 2007 Oct;41(7):561-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2006.05.010. Epub 2006 Jul 10.
9
Randomized controlled trial of interventions for young people at ultra-high risk of psychosis: twelve-month outcome.随机对照试验干预措施对处于精神病超高风险的年轻人的效果:12 个月的结果。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Apr;74(4):349-56. doi: 10.4088/JCP.12m07785. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
10
[Multidimensional assessment of coping: validation of the Brief COPE among French population].应对方式的多维评估:法国人群中简易应对方式问卷(Brief COPE)的效度验证
Encephale. 2003 Nov-Dec;29(6):507-18.

引用本文的文献

1
Baseline Clinical Characterization of Participants in the Accelerating Medicines Partnership Schizophrenia Program.加速药物合作精神分裂症项目参与者的基线临床特征
Schizophr Bull Open. 2025 Aug 25;6(1):sgaf012. doi: 10.1093/schizbullopen/sgaf012. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
-Acetylcysteine and a Specialized Preventive Intervention for Individuals at High Risk for Psychosis: A Randomized Double-Blind Multicenter Trial.-乙酰半胱氨酸与针对精神病高危个体的特殊预防性干预:一项随机双盲多中心试验。
Schizophr Bull Open. 2024 Feb 28;5(1):sgae005. doi: 10.1093/schizbullopen/sgae005. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3
The effect of stressful life events on the risk for psychosis: differences between Mexican at clinical and familial high risk.
应激性生活事件对精神病风险的影响:临床高危和家族高危的墨西哥人之间的差异
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Sep 29;14:1254993. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1254993. eCollection 2023.
4
Consistent Exposure to Psychosocial Stressors and Progressive Intolerance to Stress in Individuals at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis.临床高危精神病个体持续暴露于心理社会应激源及对压力的渐进性不耐受。
Schizophr Bull Open. 2020 Jan;1(1). doi: 10.1093/schizbullopen/sgaa004. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
5
Psychosocial stress, interpersonal sensitivity, and social withdrawal in clinical high risk for psychosis: a systematic review.精神病临床高危人群中的心理社会应激、人际敏感性和社交退缩:一项系统评价
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2023 Jun 17;9(1):38. doi: 10.1038/s41537-023-00362-z.
6
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: A Systematic Review.精神病临床高危状态下患者报告的结局指标:一项系统综述
Schizophr Bull Open. 2023 Feb 23;4(1):sgad006. doi: 10.1093/schizbullopen/sgad006. eCollection 2023 Jan.
7
The relationship between stress responding in family context and stress sensitivity with sleep dysfunction in individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis.家庭环境中应激反应与个体临床前期精神病高危人群睡眠功能障碍的应激敏感性之间的关系。
J Psychiatr Res. 2022 May;149:194-200. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.02.038. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
8
Cross-Sectional Descriptive Pilot Study on the Risk of Psychotic Disorders among Adolescents.青少年精神病性障碍风险的横断面描述性试点研究
Children (Basel). 2021 Oct 14;8(10):916. doi: 10.3390/children8100916.
9
How did Tunisian university students cope with fear of COVID-19? A comparison across schizotypy features.突尼斯大学生如何应对对新冠病毒的恐惧?一项基于分裂型人格特征的比较研究。
Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Aug;178:110872. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.110872. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
10
Acute Physiological and Psychological Stress Response in Youth at Clinical High-Risk for Psychosis.处于精神病临床高风险的青少年的急性生理和心理应激反应。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 19;12:641762. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.641762. eCollection 2021.