Corrias A, Minelli R, Pelosi U, Loi M, Pazzola P, Cuboni G, Corda R
Istituto di Clinica Pediatrica, Servizio di Allergologia ed Immunologia Infantile, Cagliari, Italia.
Pediatr Med Chir. 1990 Mar-Apr;12(2):157-60.
After 2 weeks of observation, Nedocromil has been studied in double blind vs placebo for 8 weeks in 40 children with asthma of medium seriousness. Patients had to record on a clinical diary symptoms (wheezing and cough), beta 2-agonists consumption and collateral effects of the drug. Every 2 weeks patients had a clinical examination and the physician's judgement about the treatment's efficiency was registered. Patients who took the active drug had an improvement in symptoms from the 3rd week of observation and a significative decrease in bronchodilators' consumption. The judgement about the treatment's efficiency was different between physician and patients thus preventing the recognition of the patients who had taken Nedocromil from those who had taken placebo. We think that the different consumption of beta 2-agonists could be the reason for this behaviour between the 2 groups.
经过2周的观察后,对40名中度哮喘儿童进行了为期8周的奈多罗米双盲对照安慰剂研究。患者必须在临床日记中记录症状(喘息和咳嗽)、β2受体激动剂的使用情况以及药物的副作用。每2周对患者进行一次临床检查,并记录医生对治疗效果的判断。服用活性药物的患者从观察第3周起症状有所改善,支气管扩张剂的使用量显著减少。医生和患者对治疗效果的判断存在差异,因此无法区分服用奈多罗米的患者和服用安慰剂的患者。我们认为两组之间这种行为差异的原因可能是β2受体激动剂的使用量不同。