Suppr超能文献

[关于肩袖损伤的关节镜检查结果及其手术治疗]

[Arthroscopic findings concerning rotator cuff lesions and their operative management].

作者信息

Urbánek L, Vašek P, Tuček M

机构信息

Oddělení ortopedie, traumatologie a rekonstrukční chirurgie ÚVN Praha-Střešovice.

出版信息

Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2011;78(3):237-43.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

Our objective is to introduce our simplified, easy-to-use classification of rotator cuff (RC) lesions, describe the frequency of individual findings in a considerably large series of shoulder joints examined by arthroscopy, evaluate the results of the operative management of individual lesion types, and recommend optimal surgical approaches.

MATERIAL

Over the course of 10 years (between October 1st, 2000 and December 31st, 2009), 756 arthroscopic operations on the shoulder joint were performed. RC lesions were identified in 516 cases. We categorized the lesions using our own classification. Patient characteristics were as follows: the mean age was 43 years, 69% of the patients were men, and the right shoulder was affected in 61% of the cases (with the dominant upper limb being affected in 71% of the cases). The patients were followed up for a minimum period of 6 months.

METHODS

All operations were performed in the "beach-chair" position under general anesthesia or in an interscalenic block. The arthroscope was introduced into the shoulder joint through the "soft-spot". Continuous lavage via an arthroscopic pump was used. The glenohumeral joint was examined first; an examination of the subacromial space followed. Once the lesion type was identified, other procedures were performed. In standard situations, type I lesions were managed with ASK sub- acromial decompression (SAD). As to type II lesions, we initially performed open RC reconstruction with acromioplasty, which we later replaced with ASK-assisted RC reconstruction with SAD; we are currently managing these lesions with ASK RC reconstruction + SAD. As for type III lesions, we initially used to treat them with open RC reconstruction with acromio - plasty; we are now performing ASK-assisted RC reconstruction with mini-incision + SAD. We are trying to use "double-row" sutures in certain cases. The initial management of type IV lesions consisted of ASK palliative resection of RC remnants combined with SAD. Currently, we are performing partial muscle transfer of the intact subscapularis muscle tendon (Karas) or partial non-anatomical RC reconstruction (Burkhart). A combination of both methods described above was required in some cases. If delamination of the RC was found, partial reconstruction using the "double-layer" technique took place. Open acromioplasty was added during all operations. Type V lesions are managed with ASK palliative resection of RC remnants + SAD; when this approach proves unsuccessful, which is a rare phenomenon, resurfacing follows. The results were evaluated after 6 months using a modified Constant functional score. Besides clinical examination, self-assessment questionnaires filled in by the patients were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Out of a total of 516 RC lesions, type I was the most prevalent (54%), followed by type V (16%). The prevalence of lesion types II, III and IV was about 10% each. In type I, the mean improvement measured by the Constant score was 36 points. As for type II, open reconstruction, ASK-assisted reconstruction and ASK reconstruction resulted in mean improvements of 31, 34, and 35 points, respectively. While open reconstruction of type III lesions was associated with a 27-point improvement on the Constant score, the use of ASK-assisted reconstruction resulted in a 29-point improvement. In type IV, the use of ASK palliative resection of RC remnants, muscle transfer (Karas), partial reconstruction (Burkhart), and a combination of the last two methods led to the mean 19-, 25-, 22-, and 22- point improvements respectively. Following ASK palliative resection, the mean Constant score improvement in type V lesions was 17 points, while the use of resurfacing, if performed, was associated with a 21-point improvement. DISCUSSION In type I lesions, favourable long-term outcomes are achieved through ASK SAD, which removes RC irritation within the narrowed subacromial space. RC reconstruction or sutures, which can be performed arthroscopically quite easily, are indicated in type II lesions. The situation is similar in type III lesions, where, from a technical point of view, reconstruction is facilitated by ASK-assisted reconstruction with mini-incision. Since type IV lesions are the most complex ones, the largest number of surgical management methods is described here. As for muscle transfer, the subscapularis and latissimus dorsi muscles are used most often, the latter requiring wider surgical access. Partial non-anatomical reconstruction is useful, too. New synthetic prostheses, as well as biosynthetic or biologic prostheses prepared with cultures of pluripotent stem cells, have been developed recently. Unlike some other authors, we prefer open surgery. Attempts at ASK reconstruction increase surgical time considerably, while the cosmetic effect is negligible if many ASK ports are used. Reconstruction is contraindicated in type V lesions; good outcomes are being achieved with ASK palliative resection of RC remnants (Apoil). Type I lesions are successfully managed with ASK SAD. The method of choice in type II lesions is ASK reconstruction. In type III lesions, we have been getting good results with ASK-assisted RC reconstruction with mini-incision. As for type IV lesions in older patients, we have good experience with muscle transfer of a part of the intact subscapularis muscle tendon (Karas); partial non-anatomial reconstruction (Burkhart) is deemed more beneficial in younger and more active patients. For anatomical reasons, a combination of both above-mentioned methods had to be used in some cases. ASK palliative resection of RC remnants, rarely followed by resurfacing when unsuccessful, remains the method of choice in treating type V lesions. Key words: shoulder arthroscopy, rotator cuff lesions, classification, subacromial decompression, reconstruction, open surgery, palliative resection, Constant Functional Score.

摘要

研究目的

我们的目标是介绍我们简化的、易于使用的肩袖(RC)损伤分类方法,描述在大量接受关节镜检查的肩关节中各发现的频率,评估各损伤类型手术治疗的结果,并推荐最佳手术方法。

材料

在10年期间(2000年10月1日至2009年12月31日),对肩关节进行了756例关节镜手术。516例中发现有肩袖损伤。我们使用自己的分类方法对损伤进行分类。患者特征如下:平均年龄43岁,69%为男性,61%的病例右侧肩部受累(优势上肢受累的病例占71%)。对患者进行了至少6个月的随访。

方法

所有手术均在全身麻醉或肌间沟阻滞下于“沙滩椅”位进行。通过“软点”将关节镜插入肩关节。使用关节镜泵进行持续灌洗。首先检查盂肱关节,随后检查肩峰下间隙。一旦确定损伤类型,便进行其他操作。在标准情况下,I型损伤采用ASK肩峰下减压(SAD)治疗。对于II型损伤,我们最初进行开放性肩袖重建并加做肩峰成形术,后来改为ASK辅助的肩袖重建并加做SAD;目前我们采用ASK肩袖重建+SAD来处理这些损伤。对于III型损伤,我们最初采用开放性肩袖重建并加做肩峰成形术;现在我们采用ASK辅助的小切口肩袖重建+SAD。在某些情况下我们尝试使用“双排”缝线。IV型损伤的初始治疗包括ASK对肩袖残余部分进行姑息性切除并联合SAD。目前,我们正在进行完整肩胛下肌肌腱(Karas)的部分肌肉转移或部分非解剖性肩袖重建(Burkhart)。在某些情况下需要上述两种方法联合使用。如果发现肩袖分层,则采用“双层”技术进行部分重建。所有手术均加做开放性肩峰成形术。V型损伤采用ASK对肩袖残余部分进行姑息性切除+SAD治疗;当这种方法证明不成功时(这是一种罕见情况),则进行表面置换。6个月后使用改良的Constant功能评分评估结果。除了临床检查外,还对患者填写的自我评估问卷进行了评估。

结果

在总共516例肩袖损伤中,I型最为常见(54%),其次是V型(16%)。II、III和IV型损伤的发生率均约为10%。在I型中,Constant评分测量的平均改善为36分。对于II型,开放性重建、ASK辅助重建和ASK重建导致的平均改善分别为3l、34和35分。虽然III型损伤的开放性重建与Constant评分提高27分相关,但使用ASK辅助重建导致提高29分。在IV型中,使用ASK对肩袖残余部分进行姑息性切除、肌肉转移(Karas)、部分重建(Burkhart)以及后两种方法联合使用分别导致平均提高19、25、22和22分。在ASK姑息性切除后,V型损伤的Constant评分平均提高17分,而进行表面置换(如果进行)则与提高21分相关。

讨论

在I型损伤中,通过ASK SAD可获得良好的长期结果,该方法可消除狭窄肩峰下间隙内对肩袖的刺激。II型损伤适合进行肩袖重建或缝合,这可以很容易地通过关节镜完成。III型损伤情况类似,从技术角度来看,ASK辅助的小切口重建便于进行重建。由于IV型损伤是最复杂的,这里描述了最多的手术治疗方法。至于肌肉转移,最常使用肩胛下肌和背阔肌,后者需要更广泛的手术入路。部分非解剖性重建也很有用。最近开发了新的合成假体以及用多能干细胞培养制备的生物合成或生物假体。与其他一些作者不同,我们更喜欢开放手术。尝试进行ASK重建会显著增加手术时间,而如果使用多个ASK端口,美容效果可忽略不计。V型损伤禁忌进行重建;对肩袖残余部分进行ASK姑息性切除(Apoil)可取得良好结果。I型损伤通过ASK SAD成功治疗。II型损伤的首选方法是ASK重建。在III型损伤中,我们采用ASK辅助的小切口肩袖重建取得了良好效果。对于老年患者的IV型损伤,我们对完整肩胛下肌肌腱的部分肌肉转移(Karas)有良好经验;部分非解剖性重建(Burkhart)在年轻且活动较多的患者中被认为更有益。由于解剖学原因,在某些情况下必须联合使用上述两种方法。对肩袖残余部分进行ASK姑息性切除,不成功时很少进行表面置换,仍然是治疗V型损伤的首选方法。关键词:肩关节镜检查,肩袖损伤,分类,肩峰下减压,重建,开放手术,姑息性切除,Constant功能评分

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验