Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Health Policy Plan. 2011 Jul;26 Suppl 1:i13-9. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czr030.
Escalating costs and increasing pressure to improve health services have driven a trend toward contracting with the private sector to provide traditionally state-run services. Such contracting is seen as an opportunity to combine theorized advantages of contracting with the efficiency of the private sector. There is still a limited understanding of the preconditions for successful use of contracting and the resources needed for their appropriate use and sustainability. This study assesses the large-scale contracting of 294 non-governmental organizations (NGOs) for delivery of basic health services in Uttar Pradesh, a state with almost 170 million in India. Due to high rates of discontinuation or non-renewal of contracts based on poor performance in the project, a better method for selecting partners was requested. Data on characteristics of the NGOs (intake data) and performance/outcome monitoring indicators were combined to identify correlations. The results showed that NGOs selected were generally small but well-established, had implemented at least two large projects, and had more non-health experience than health experience. Bivariate regressions of outcome score on each input variable showed that training experience, proposal quality and having 'health' contained in the objectives of the organization were statistically significant predictors of good performance. Factors relating to financial capacity, staff qualification, previous experience with health or non-health projects, and age of establishment were not. A combined training plus proposal score was highly predictive of outcome score (β = 1.37, P < 0.001). The combined score was found to be a much better predictor of outcome scores than a total score used to select NGOs (β = 0.073, P = 0.539). The study provides valuable information from large-scale contracting. Conclusions on criteria for selecting NGOs for providing basic health care could guide other governments choosing to contract for such services.
成本不断攀升,改善医疗服务的压力不断增大,这促使人们倾向于与私营部门签订合同,由后者提供传统的国营服务。这种合同被视为一种结合了合同理论优势和私营部门效率的机会。对于成功使用合同的前提条件以及适当使用和可持续性所需的资源,人们的理解仍然有限。本研究评估了在印度人口近 1.7 亿的北方邦将 294 个非政府组织(NGO)大规模承包提供基本医疗服务的情况。由于基于项目表现不佳而大量终止或不续签合同,因此需要一种更好的选择合作伙伴的方法。将 NGO 的特征(投入数据)和绩效/结果监测指标的数据相结合,以确定相关性。结果表明,选择的 NGO 通常规模较小但基础良好,已经实施了至少两个大型项目,并且拥有比卫生经验更多的非卫生经验。对每个输入变量的结果得分进行双变量回归表明,培训经验、提案质量以及组织目标中包含“卫生”是良好表现的统计显著预测因素。与财务能力、员工资质、以前的卫生或非卫生项目经验以及建立时间有关的因素则不然。培训加提案的综合评分高度预测结果评分(β=1.37,P<0.001)。综合评分被发现是预测结果评分的一个更好指标,而不是用于选择 NGO 的总评分(β=0.073,P=0.539)。该研究提供了大规模承包的宝贵信息。有关选择 NGO 提供基本医疗保健服务的标准的结论可以为选择此类服务签订合同的其他政府提供指导。