Nutritional Sciences Research Division, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
J Am Coll Nutr. 2011 Apr;30(2):113-25. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2011.10719950.
Glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) have been independently assessed with regard to their metabolic effects and their associations with disease risk. Because a low-GI high-carbohydrate and a high-GI low-carbohydrate food/meal can produce the same GL, we propose that these 2 concepts should be used in conjunction to characterize the carbohydrate quality of mixed meals.
The aim of this study was to measure postprandial glucose, insulin, and cortisol responses of meals differing in both GI and GL over a period of 3 hours (every 15 minutes for the first hour, and every 30 minutes subsequently), and to investigate the validity of methods of calculating GI and GL by measuring the cumulative incremental area under the curve (iAUC) for glucose and insulin (0-2 hours and 2-3 hours postprandially).
A total of 10 healthy lean young adults (5 males, 5 females) participated. Breakfast meals were designed to differ in terms of GI and GL based on a 2 × 2 grid with a single elaboration: low-GI high-GL (M1); high-GI high-GL (M2a) of similar GL to M1; high-GI high-GL (M2b) of similar macronutrient composition to M1 (the elaboration); low-GI low-GL (M3); and high-GI low-GL (M4). The 5 breakfast meals were administered in a double-blind randomized crossover design. Repeated measures analysis of variance was performed to investigate differences in metabolic response between low- versus high-GI and between low- versus high-GL breakfast meals (and GI × GL interactions), with GI and GL used as within-subject factors.
High-GL meals increased glucose iAUC and insulin iAUC in both immediate (0-2 hours) (p < 0.01, p < 0.001, respectively) and middle postabsorptive periods (2-3 hours) (p = 0.04, p = 0.02, respectively) compared with low-GL meals. GI meals were not associated with glucose iAUC 0 to 2 hours (p = 0.37) and 2 to 3 hours (p = 0.81) postprandially. GI meals were not associated with insulin iAUC 0 to 2 hours postprandially (p = 0.81); in contrast, high-GI meals increased insulin iAUC 2 to 3 hours postprandially (p = 0.03) compared with low-GI meals. No significant differences were noted in cortisol responses, GI × GL interactions, or effect modification by gender.
These findings highlight the need for further investigation of meals/diets differing in both GI and GL to characterize metabolic responses and potential health effects.
血糖指数 (GI) 和血糖负荷 (GL) 已分别在代谢效应及其与疾病风险的相关性方面进行了评估。由于低 GI 高碳水化合物和高 GI 低碳水化合物的食物/餐可以产生相同的 GL,因此我们建议这两个概念应结合使用,以描述混合餐的碳水化合物质量。
本研究的目的是测量不同 GI 和 GL 的餐后血糖、胰岛素和皮质醇反应,持续 3 小时(前 1 小时每 15 分钟测量一次,随后每 30 分钟测量一次),并通过测量葡萄糖和胰岛素的累积增量曲线下面积(0-2 小时和 2-3 小时餐后)来验证计算 GI 和 GL 的方法的有效性。
共有 10 名健康的年轻成年人(5 名男性,5 名女性)参与了这项研究。早餐餐的设计在 GI 和 GL 方面基于 2×2 网格,具有单一的精细化:低 GI 高 GL(M1);高 GI 高 GL(M2a)与 M1 具有相似的 GL;高 GI 高 GL(M2b)与 M1 具有相似的宏量营养素组成(精细化);低 GI 低 GL(M3);和高 GI 低 GL(M4)。这 5 种早餐餐以双盲随机交叉设计进行管理。采用重复测量方差分析来研究低 GI 与高 GI 和低 GL 与高 GL 早餐餐之间的代谢反应差异(以及 GI 和 GL 的交互作用),GI 和 GL 作为受试者内因素。
高 GL 餐在即时(0-2 小时)(p<0.01,p<0.001)和中间吸收后时期(2-3 小时)(p=0.04,p=0.02)增加了葡萄糖增量曲线下面积和胰岛素增量曲线下面积与低 GL 餐相比。GI 餐与 0 到 2 小时(p=0.37)和 2 到 3 小时(p=0.81)餐后的葡萄糖增量曲线下面积无关。GI 餐与 0 到 2 小时(p=0.81)和 2 到 3 小时(p=0.81)餐后的胰岛素增量曲线下面积无关;相反,高 GI 餐增加了 2 到 3 小时(p=0.03)餐后的胰岛素增量曲线下面积与低 GI 餐相比。皮质醇反应、GI×GL 相互作用或性别对效应修饰均无显著差异。
这些发现强调需要进一步研究 GI 和 GL 均不同的膳食,以描述代谢反应和潜在的健康影响。