Cleveland Clinic Orthopaedic Surgery, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.
Foot Ankle Int. 2011 May;32(5):S503-7. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2011.0503.
The use of minimally invasive surgical technique for hallux valgus is controversial. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the radiographic results of a minimally invasive distal metatarsal osteotomy for correction of hallux valgus.
From September 2005 to March 2008, a minimally invasive distal metatarsal osteotomy was performed in 82 patients (125 feet) for hallux valgus. The average age was 40.8 (range, 13 to 71) years. The mean followup period was 18.3 (range, 9 to 38) months. These patients were categorized into groups based on their gender, age, preoperative hallux valgus angle, and preoperative 1-2 intermetatarsal angle. The radiographs were reviewed for preoperative and final followup hallux valgus angle, 1-2 intermetatarsal angle, and malunion or nonunion. A final followup hallux valgus angle greater than 20 degrees was defined as ``recurrence of deformity'' and represented a poor radiographic result.
There were no nonunions but one case of plantarflexion malunion. One case had skin irritation due to prominent bone. A poor radiographic result occurred in 29 feet (23.2%). Of those 36 feet whose preoperative hallux valgus angle was equal or greater than 30 degrees, 23 feet had a poor radiographic result (63.9%). Of those 89 feet whose preoperative hallux valgus angle was less than 30 degrees, only six feet had a poor radiographic result (6.7%) (p = 0.0001). The preoperative 1-2 intermetatarsal angle was found to have no statistically significant influence on poor radiographic results (p = 0.0539). Both the age and sex of the patients had no statistically significant influence (p = 0.8048 and 0.8604, respectively).
Based on our results, we do not recommend use of this technique to treat moderate to severe hallux valgus (hallux valgus angle, 30) degrees. We believe a traditional open osteotomy with formal capsulorrhaphy would be a better choice of treatment.
微创外科技术治疗拇外翻存在争议。本研究的目的是回顾性评估微创跖骨远端截骨术治疗拇外翻的放射学结果。
2005 年 9 月至 2008 年 3 月,对 82 例(125 足)拇外翻患者行微创跖骨远端截骨术。患者平均年龄为 40.8(1371)岁。平均随访时间为 18.3(938)个月。根据患者性别、年龄、术前拇外翻角和术前 1-2 跖骨间角将其分为不同组。评估术前和末次随访时的拇外翻角、1-2 跖骨间角、畸形愈合或不愈合。末次随访时拇外翻角大于 20 度定义为“畸形复发”,表示放射学结果较差。
无骨不连,但有 1 例跖屈畸形愈合。1 例因骨突出出现皮肤刺激。29 足(23.2%)放射学结果较差。术前拇外翻角等于或大于 30 度的 36 足中,23 足放射学结果较差(63.9%)。术前拇外翻角小于 30 度的 89 足中,仅有 6 足放射学结果较差(6.7%)(p = 0.0001)。术前 1-2 跖骨间角对放射学结果无显著影响(p = 0.0539)。患者年龄和性别对放射学结果也无显著影响(p = 0.8048 和 0.8604)。
根据我们的结果,我们不建议将该技术用于治疗中度至重度拇外翻(拇外翻角 30 度)。我们认为传统的切开截骨术加正规的关节囊紧缩术是更好的治疗选择。