Suppr超能文献

微创V形截骨术与博世经皮截骨术治疗拇外翻。中期结果。比较放射学研究。

Minimally Invasive Chevron Surgery and Bosch Percutaneous Osteotomy in Hallux Valgus Treatment. Midterm Results. Comparative Radiological Study.

作者信息

Yañez Arauz Juan Manuel, Raimondi Nicolás, Eksarho Andrés, Lauritto Diego, Yañez Arauz Maria Eugenia, Yañez Arauz Juan Martin

机构信息

Serviço de Pé e Tornozelo, Hospital Universitario Austral, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Faculdade de Medicina, Universidad Austral, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

出版信息

Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2021 Nov 11;57(2):250-256. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1729590. eCollection 2022 Apr.

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to compare the radiological results of angular correction and its maintenance in the medium term between two minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of hallux valgus (minimally invasive chevron surgery vs. Bosch technique).  A comparative prospective analysis of patients undergoing surgery for symptomatic hallux valgus deformity was performed. We compared two minimally invasive techniques in homogeneous groups of population. Two groups of 62 and 63 feet respectively, were constituted. We compared first ray angular corrections and consolidation as well as the correction power of both osteotomies and their maintenance over time. The postoperative complications and surgical time in both study groups were also evaluated. The minimum follow-up was 2 years.  There were differences between both groups in the intermetatarsal angle at 24 months postsurgery. There were no differences between both groups regarding metatarsophalangeal angle, and distal metatarsal articular angle. There were no intraoperative complications in either group. The surgical time between both groups had statistically significant differences.  Both screw-stabilized, Bosch surgery and minimally invasive chevron (hybrid when associated with percutaneous Akin osteotomy) present adequate correction of moderate hallux valgus. However, patients treated with Bosch percutaneous surgery had a greater correction power of the intermetatarsal angle in the medium term, as well as a shorter surgical time, when compared with those who were treated with chevron osteotomy. Both techniques had a similar evolution over time regarding loss of correction and postoperative complications.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较两种治疗拇外翻的微创技术(微创V形截骨术与博世技术)在中期的角度矫正及其维持的放射学结果。

对有症状的拇外翻畸形患者进行手术的比较性前瞻性分析。我们在同质人群组中比较了两种微创技术。分别组成了两组,每组62只脚和63只脚。我们比较了第一跖骨的角度矫正和巩固情况,以及两种截骨术的矫正力及其随时间的维持情况。还评估了两个研究组的术后并发症和手术时间。最短随访时间为2年。

术后24个月时,两组间的跖间角存在差异。两组在跖趾角和远端跖骨关节角方面没有差异。两组均无术中并发症。两组间的手术时间有统计学上的显著差异。

螺钉固定的博世手术和微创V形截骨术(与经皮Akin截骨术联合时为混合术式)对中度拇外翻均有足够的矫正效果。然而,与接受V形截骨术治疗的患者相比,接受博世经皮手术治疗的患者在中期对跖间角的矫正力更大,且手术时间更短。两种技术在矫正丢失和术后并发症方面随时间的演变相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9bd/9142267/2d2fa9bc6dbe/10-1055-s-0041-1729590-i2000293en-2.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验