Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Palliat Med. 2012 Oct;26(7):873-8. doi: 10.1177/0269216311412227. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
There is a concern that pain is under-recognized in dementia. However, there may be other causes of distress. We wished to evaluate the utility of a distress tool and a pain tool.
Nursing home residents with advanced dementia were observed using pain (Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia scale (PAINAD)) and distress (Disability Distress Assessment Tool (DisDAT)) assessment tools. Those in pain were treated. Reassessment occurred at one and three months.
From 79 participants, 13 were assessed as being in pain. Psychosocial factors explained the behaviour of a false positive group. Both tools showed a significant decrease in pain following intervention (p = 0.008). Behaviours were similar in both groups.
Both tools are useful. However, the pain tool also picks up distress, which is not caused by pain. It could potentially lead to false ascriptions of pain. The distress tool picks up a broader array of signs, which may be useful both in practice and in research.
人们担心痴呆症患者的疼痛未得到充分识别。然而,可能还有其他导致痛苦的原因。我们希望评估痛苦工具和疼痛工具的效用。
使用疼痛评估工具(疼痛评估在晚期痴呆症量表(PAINAD))和痛苦评估工具(残疾痛苦评估工具(DisDAT))观察患有晚期痴呆症的养老院居民。对有疼痛的人进行治疗。在一个月和三个月时进行重新评估。
在 79 名参与者中,有 13 人被评估为疼痛。心理社会因素解释了假阳性组的行为。两种工具在干预后疼痛均显著减轻(p = 0.008)。两组的行为相似。
两种工具都很有用。然而,疼痛工具也会引起疼痛以外的痛苦,这并不是由疼痛引起的。它可能会导致疼痛的错误归因。痛苦工具可以发现更广泛的迹象,这在实践和研究中都可能有用。