Department of Restorative Dentistry, University Estadual de Ponta Grossa, Parana, Brazil.
Oper Dent. 2011 May-Jun;36(3):251-7. doi: 10.2341/10-289-C. Epub 2011 Jul 8.
This clinical study evaluated the effects of light-emitting diode (LED)/laser activation on bleaching effectiveness (BE) and tooth sensitivity (TS) during in-office bleaching. Thirty caries-free patients were divided into two groups: light-activated (LA) and non-activated (NA) groups. A 35% hydrogen peroxide gel (Whiteness HP Maxx, FGM Dental Products, Joinville SC, Brazil) was used in three 15-minute applications for both groups. For the LA group, LED/laser energy (Whitening Lase Light Plus, DMC Odontológica, São Carlos SP, Brazil) was used, in accordance with the manufacturer's directions. Two sessions of bleaching were performed at one-week intervals. Color was registered at baseline and after the first and second bleaching sessions using a Vita shade guide. Patients recorded TS on a 0 to 4 scale during bleaching and within the next 24 and 48 hours of each session. BE at recall each week and intensity of TS were evaluated by repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey tests (α=0.05). Tooth sensitivity was compared using the Friedman repeated measures analysis of variance by rank and the Wilcoxon sign-ranked test. Faster bleaching was observed for the LA group than for the NA group after the first session (4.8 and 3.8 shade guide units [SGUs]; p=0.0001). However, both techniques were capable of bleaching the same number of SGUs after the second bleaching session (p=0.52). Most of the LA group (53.3%) had sensitivity even 24 hours after each bleaching session, but only 26.6% from the NA group reported TS. The intensity of TS was similar for both groups immediately after bleaching but significantly higher for the LA group 24 hours after each bleaching session (p=0.001). After two bleaching sessions, the use of LED/laser light activation did not improve bleaching speed. Persistent tooth sensitivity and higher tooth sensitivity after 24 hours of bleaching were observed when light activation was used.
本临床研究评估了光致发光二极管(LED)/激光激活对诊室漂白过程中漂白效果(BE)和牙齿敏感(TS)的影响。将 30 名无龋患者分为两组:光激活(LA)组和非激活(NA)组。两组均使用 35%过氧化氢凝胶(Whiteness HP Maxx,FGM Dental Products,Joinville SC,巴西),每次 15 分钟,共使用 3 次。对于 LA 组,按照制造商的说明使用 LED/激光能量(Whitening Lase Light Plus,DMC Odontológica,São Carlos SP,巴西)。每两周进行两次漂白治疗。在基线、第一次和第二次漂白后使用 Vita 比色指南记录颜色。患者在漂白过程中以及每次治疗后 24 小时和 48 小时内使用 0 到 4 分制记录 TS。每周通过重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)和 Tukey 检验评估 BE 和 TS 强度(α=0.05)。使用 Friedman 重复测量方差分析和 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验比较牙齿敏感。LA 组在第一次治疗后比 NA 组的漂白速度更快(4.8 和 3.8 个比色单位 [SGU];p=0.0001)。然而,两组在第二次漂白后都能漂白相同数量的 SGU(p=0.52)。LA 组的大部分患者(53.3%)在每次漂白后 24 小时内仍有敏感,但 NA 组仅有 26.6%的患者报告有 TS。两组在漂白后即刻的 TS 强度相似,但 LA 组在每次漂白后 24 小时的 TS 强度显著更高(p=0.001)。两次漂白后,使用 LED/激光光激活并未提高漂白速度。在使用光激活时,观察到持续的牙齿敏感和漂白后 24 小时牙齿敏感更高。