• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

过敏反应学生和工作人员的准备。

Preparedness for students and staff with anaphylaxis.

机构信息

Siskiyou County Office of Education, Mount Shasta, CA 96067, USA.

出版信息

J Sch Health. 2011 Aug;81(8):471-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2011.00616.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2011.00616.x
PMID:21740432
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Schools are responsible for handling life-threatening events due to a variety of conditions, including anaphylaxis. California is one of a few states that permits school districts to stock emergency epinephrine auto-injectors and to train unlicensed assistive personnel to administer epinephrine for a life-threatening event. We surveyed school nurses in California to explore their experience with life-threatening anaphylaxis, implementation of allowable stock epinephrine auto-injector programs, and the barriers to program implementation.

METHODS

An exploratory, cross-sectional, descriptive design was used for this study. Data was obtained from a convenience sample of 171 credentialed California school nurses via an online survey service. Descriptive statistics and Pearson's chi-square were used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Thirty percent of school nurses reported using 1 student's prescribed medication to rescue another student in distress. Despite the frequency of using another student's rescue medication and California's permissive policy, only 13% of nurses reported having stock epinephrine programs. Barriers to stock epinephrine programs included: (a) limited availability of school nursing services, (b) lack of policies or guidelines, (c) inadequate funding for training and medication, and (d) lack of education. Limited awareness of susceptibility and the immediate life-threatening nature of anaphylaxis were also contributing factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Legislative initiatives are sufficient to develop safe, effective policies and protocols to manage life-threatening allergic reaction in schools. The findings indicate that more education is needed for school personnel and research is needed to determine an effective mechanism to remove barriers for emergency care during school hours.

摘要

背景

学校有责任处理各种情况下的危及生命的事件,包括过敏反应。加利福尼亚州是少数几个允许学区储备紧急肾上腺素自动注射器并培训无执照的辅助人员在危及生命的情况下使用肾上腺素的州之一。我们对加利福尼亚州的学校护士进行了调查,以探讨他们在危及生命的过敏反应方面的经验、允许的储备肾上腺素自动注射器计划的实施情况以及实施计划的障碍。

方法

本研究采用探索性、横断面、描述性设计。通过在线调查服务从 171 名有证书的加利福尼亚州学校护士中获取了数据。使用描述性统计和 Pearson's chi-square 分析数据。

结果

30%的学校护士报告说曾使用 1 名学生的处方药物来抢救另一名处于困境中的学生。尽管经常使用另一名学生的急救药物,而且加利福尼亚州的政策允许,但只有 13%的护士报告说有储备肾上腺素计划。储备肾上腺素计划的障碍包括:(a)学校护理服务有限,(b)缺乏政策或指南,(c)培训和药物资金不足,以及(d)缺乏教育。对过敏反应的易感性和即时危及生命的性质的认识有限也是促成因素。

结论

立法举措足以制定安全、有效的政策和协议,以管理学校内危及生命的过敏反应。研究结果表明,学校人员需要更多的教育,需要研究确定在上课时间消除紧急护理障碍的有效机制。

相似文献

1
Preparedness for students and staff with anaphylaxis.过敏反应学生和工作人员的准备。
J Sch Health. 2011 Aug;81(8):471-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2011.00616.x.
2
The preparedness of schools to respond to emergencies in children: a national survey of school nurses.学校应对儿童紧急情况的准备情况:一项针对学校护士的全国性调查。
Pediatrics. 2005 Dec;116(6):e738-45. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1474.
3
Epinephrine Policies and Protocols Guidance for Schools: Equipping School Nurses to Save Lives.学校肾上腺素政策与协议指南:让学校护士有能力挽救生命。
NASN Sch Nurse. 2016 Jan;31(1):13-22. doi: 10.1177/1942602X15607604.
4
Barriers to the Administration of Epinephrine in Schools.学校中肾上腺素给药的障碍。
J Sch Health. 2018 May;88(5):396-404. doi: 10.1111/josh.12620.
5
Life-threatening asthma and anaphylaxis in schools: a treatment model for school-based programs.学校中的危及生命的哮喘和过敏反应:一种针对校本项目的治疗模式。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2006 Mar;96(3):398-405. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60906-4.
6
Administration of epinephrine for life-threatening allergic reactions in school settings.在学校环境中使用肾上腺素治疗危及生命的过敏反应。
Pediatrics. 2005 Nov;116(5):1134-40. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1475.
7
An intervention to increase high school students' compliance with carrying auto-injectable epinephrine: a MASNRN study.一项提高高中生携带自动注射肾上腺素依从性的干预措施:一项MASNRN研究。
J Sch Nurs. 2012 Jun;28(3):230-7. doi: 10.1177/1059840511431459. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
8
Managing the student with severe food allergies.管理患有严重食物过敏的学生。
J Sch Nurs. 2012 Jun;28(3):187-94. doi: 10.1177/1059840511429686. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
9
A workshop with practical training for anaphylaxis management improves the self-efficacy of school personnel.一场关于过敏反应管理的实践培训工作坊提高了学校工作人员的自我效能感。
Allergol Int. 2015 Apr;64(2):156-60. doi: 10.1016/j.alit.2014.10.005. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
10
Potential life-threatening events in schools involving rescue inhalers, epinephrine autoinjectors, and glucagon delivery devices: reports from school nurses.学校中涉及急救吸入器、肾上腺素自动注射器和胰高血糖素给药装置的潜在危及生命事件:学校护士的报告。
J Sch Nurs. 2012 Feb;28(1):47-55. doi: 10.1177/1059840511420726. Epub 2011 Aug 30.

引用本文的文献

1
A National Review of State Laws for Stock Epinephrine in Schools.国家审查学校中肾上腺素自动注射器的州立法规。
J Sch Health. 2022 Feb;92(2):209-222. doi: 10.1111/josh.13119. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
2
A Mixed-Methods Approach-Based Study of Anaphylaxis Awareness and Educational Needs among Nursing Students.基于混合方法的护理学生过敏反应意识和教育需求研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 2;18(17):9280. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179280.
3
Does Informal Education Training Increase Awareness of Anaphylaxis among Students of Medicine? Before-After Survey Study.
非正式教育培训是否能提高医学生对过敏反应的认识?一项前后对照的调查研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 1;18(15):8150. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18158150.
4
Epinephrine Auto-Injectors for Anaphylaxis Treatment in the School Setting: A Discussion Paper.学校环境中用于过敏反应治疗的肾上腺素自动注射器:一篇讨论文件。
SAGE Open Nurs. 2019 May 23;5:2377960819845246. doi: 10.1177/2377960819845246. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
5
Parent perspectives on school food allergy policy.家长对学校食物过敏政策的看法。
BMC Pediatr. 2018 May 12;18(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1135-6.
6
Management of anaphylaxis in children: a survey of parents and school personnel in Qatar.卡塔尔儿童过敏反应的管理:对家长和学校工作人员的一项调查
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2017 Oct 25;1(1):e000077. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2017-000077. eCollection 2017.
7
Knowledge of allergies and performance in epinephrine auto-injector use: a controlled intervention in preschool teachers.过敏知识和肾上腺素自动注射器使用表现:对学前教师的对照干预。
Eur J Pediatr. 2018 Apr;177(4):575-581. doi: 10.1007/s00431-017-3073-y. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
8
Childcare and School Management Issues in Food Allergy.食物过敏中的儿童保育与学校管理问题
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2016 Nov;16(12):83. doi: 10.1007/s11882-016-0663-0.
9
Training and administration of epinephrine auto-injectors for anaphylaxis treatment in US schools: results from the EpiPen4Schools(®) pilot survey.美国学校用于过敏反应治疗的肾上腺素自动注射器的培训与管理:来自EpiPen4Schools(®)试点调查的结果
J Asthma Allergy. 2016 Jun 17;9:109-15. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S106567. eCollection 2016.
10
Identifying barriers to chronic disease reporting in Chicago Public Schools: a mixed-methods approach.识别芝加哥公立学校慢性病报告障碍:一种混合方法。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Dec 6;14:1250. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1250.