School of Health Science, Nursing Science, 33014 FIN, University of Tampere, Finland.
Appl Nurs Res. 2012 Aug;25(3):171-80. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2011.03.002. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
This article examines the possibilities offered by the triangulative approach and the challenges using it related to intimate partner violence (IPV) research. The purpose of this descriptive, cross-sectional, multicenter study was to create a preliminary model for identifying women exposed to acute physical IPV seeking care at emergency departments (EDs) and for intervening in the violence. The model is based on the results of previous research and the example study. A multiple approach was chosen to describe and understand better the factors that have an influence on the identification of IPV and its intervention from the women's (n = 35) and the ED professional's (n = 480) perspectives. Research material was collected from 28 EDs with questionnaires. Secondly, semistructured interviews were carried out with 7 women and 20 ED professionals. The data were analyzed using quantitative and qualitative methods. The advantage of the triangulative approach is that it provides a view of the phenomenon in a variety of ways, completing and confirming the results. The problem of this method is that it is laborious for the researcher.
本文探讨了三角测量方法所提供的可能性以及在亲密伴侣暴力（IPV）研究中使用该方法所面临的挑战。本描述性、横断性、多中心研究的目的是为在急诊部（ED）寻求护理的急性身体 IPV 暴露妇女创建一个初步的识别模型，并对暴力进行干预。该模型基于先前的研究结果和示例研究。选择了多种方法来描述和更好地理解从妇女（n=35）和 ED 专业人员（n=480）的角度对 IPV 的识别及其干预的影响因素。从 28 个 ED 收集了问卷形式的研究材料。其次，对 7 名妇女和 20 名 ED 专业人员进行了半结构化访谈。使用定量和定性方法对数据进行分析。三角测量方法的优势在于它可以从多种角度提供对现象的看法，从而补充和证实结果。该方法的问题是它对研究人员来说很费力。
