Division of Rehabilitation, Fujita Memorial Nanakuri Institute, Fujita Health University, 1865 Hisai-ishikichou, Tsu, Mie 514-1296, Japan.
Gait Posture. 2011 Jul;34(3):295-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.05.007. Epub 2011 Jul 13.
The standing test for imbalance and disequilibrium (SIDE) is a discriminative measure developed for the purpose of identifying balance deficits that may cause falls. The purpose of the present study was to determine the validity of the sequence of postures used in SIDE. Subjects comprised 30 men with a mean (±standard deviation) age of 21.9±3.11 years (range 19-32 years) and 30 women with a mean age of 20.7±1.24 years (range 19-23 years). Center of pressure (COP) was measured using a stabilometer recording for 30s with a 20-Hz sampling frequency. The measurement postures that were similar to postures adopted in the SIDE were: standing with feet 20cm apart; standing with legs close and the insides of both feet touching; two tandem standing positions (with the dominant foot forward and with the non-dominant foot forward); and two single-leg standing positions (on the dominant foot and on the non-dominant foot). We calculated total path length and envelopment area of sway from the COP data. Statistical differences in means were determined using the Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison test. Results indicate that the orders of total path length and envelopment areas of sway in each posture were consistent with the item order of SIDE. Significant differences existed between the means of total path length and envelopment areas of sway in each posture (p<0.05), with the exception of both tandem standing positions and both one-leg standing positions. The item order of SIDE appears to show concurrent validity in terms of the amount of body sway in the adopted postures.
失衡和失稳的站立测试(SIDE)是一种有鉴别力的测量方法,旨在识别可能导致跌倒的平衡缺陷。本研究的目的是确定 SIDE 中所采用的姿势序列的有效性。受试者包括 30 名男性,平均年龄(±标准差)为 21.9±3.11 岁(19-32 岁),30 名女性,平均年龄为 20.7±1.24 岁(19-23 岁)。使用稳定器记录 30s,采样频率为 20Hz,测量了中心压力(COP)。与 SIDE 中采用的姿势相似的测量姿势包括:双脚分开 20cm 站立;双腿并拢,双脚内侧接触站立;两种前后脚的串联站立姿势;两种单腿站立姿势(在优势脚和非优势脚)。我们从 COP 数据中计算了总路径长度和摆动包络面积。使用 Tukey-Kramer 多重比较检验确定均值的统计差异。结果表明,每个姿势的总路径长度和摆动包络面积的顺序与 SIDE 的项目顺序一致。除了两种前后脚的串联站立姿势和两种单腿站立姿势外,每个姿势的总路径长度和摆动包络面积的均值之间存在显著差异(p<0.05)。SIDE 的项目顺序在采用的姿势中的身体摆动量方面似乎具有同时效度。