• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

严谨性:在循证实践的追求中迷失

Rigor: lost in the quest for evidence-based practice.

作者信息

Florczak Kristine L

机构信息

Saint Xavier University, Woodridge, Illinois 60517, USA.

出版信息

Nurs Sci Q. 2011 Jul;24(3):202-5. doi: 10.1177/0894318411409429.

DOI:10.1177/0894318411409429
PMID:21742708
Abstract

The purpose of this column is to bring to light a lack of rigor in the design of randomized controlled trials. In this effort, basic tenets of quantitative design are considered including delineation of populations along with probability and non-probability sampling techniques in addition to defining random selection and random assignment. The idea that randomized controlled trials, considered the pièce de résistance of the evidence-based practice movement, lack rigor because of their use of randomly assigned groups without random selection of subjects is presented.

摘要

本专栏的目的是揭示随机对照试验设计中缺乏严谨性的问题。在这项工作中,我们考虑了定量设计的基本原则,包括群体的界定以及概率抽样和非概率抽样技术,此外还对随机选择和随机分配进行了定义。文中提出,随机对照试验被视为循证实践运动的核心成果,但由于其在随机分配组时未对受试者进行随机选择,因而缺乏严谨性。

相似文献

1
Rigor: lost in the quest for evidence-based practice.严谨性:在循证实践的追求中迷失
Nurs Sci Q. 2011 Jul;24(3):202-5. doi: 10.1177/0894318411409429.
2
Challenging issues in randomised controlled trials.随机对照试验中的挑战性问题。
Injury. 2010 Jul;41 Suppl 1:S20-3. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.03.033. Epub 2010 Apr 22.
3
Hierarchy of evidence and appraisal of limitations (HEAL) grading system.证据等级与局限性评估(HEAL)分级系统
Eval Program Plann. 2015 Feb;48:149-59. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.08.003. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
4
From randomized controlled trials to evidence grading schemes: current state of evidence-based practice in social sciences.从随机对照试验到证据分级方案:社会科学循证实践的现状。
J Evid Based Med. 2008 Nov;1(1):41-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-5391.2008.00004.x.
5
[Position: methods and designs of empirical research in the field of education - inventory and barriers for experimental research].[教育领域实证研究的定位:方法与设计——实验研究的清单与障碍]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2013;107(1):19-22. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.12.020. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
6
Evidence-based postoperative pain management in nursing: is a randomized-controlled trial the most appropriate design?护理中基于证据的术后疼痛管理:随机对照试验是最合适的设计吗?
J Nurs Manag. 2004 May;12(3):183-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2004.00473.x.
7
Generalizability of the results of randomized trials.随机试验结果的可推广性。
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Jan 28;168(2):133-5. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2007.30.
8
A critical assessment of the quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials in the urology literature.对泌尿外科文献中随机对照试验报告质量的批判性评估。
J Urol. 2007 Mar;177(3):1090-4; discussion 1094-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.027.
9
Redefining the randomized controlled trial in the context of acupuncture research.在针灸研究背景下重新定义随机对照试验。
Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2006 May;12(2):91-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2005.10.001. Epub 2006 Mar 30.
10
The clinician as investigator: participating in clinical trials in the practice setting: Appendix 2: statistical concepts in study design and analysis.临床医生作为研究者:在实际临床环境中参与临床试验:附录2:研究设计与分析中的统计学概念
Circulation. 2004 Jun 1;109(21):e305-7. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000129020.43304.A7.