Suppr超能文献

严谨性:在循证实践的追求中迷失

Rigor: lost in the quest for evidence-based practice.

作者信息

Florczak Kristine L

机构信息

Saint Xavier University, Woodridge, Illinois 60517, USA.

出版信息

Nurs Sci Q. 2011 Jul;24(3):202-5. doi: 10.1177/0894318411409429.

Abstract

The purpose of this column is to bring to light a lack of rigor in the design of randomized controlled trials. In this effort, basic tenets of quantitative design are considered including delineation of populations along with probability and non-probability sampling techniques in addition to defining random selection and random assignment. The idea that randomized controlled trials, considered the pièce de résistance of the evidence-based practice movement, lack rigor because of their use of randomly assigned groups without random selection of subjects is presented.

摘要

本专栏的目的是揭示随机对照试验设计中缺乏严谨性的问题。在这项工作中,我们考虑了定量设计的基本原则,包括群体的界定以及概率抽样和非概率抽样技术,此外还对随机选择和随机分配进行了定义。文中提出,随机对照试验被视为循证实践运动的核心成果,但由于其在随机分配组时未对受试者进行随机选择,因而缺乏严谨性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验