Center for Cell and Gene Therapy, Baylor College of Medicine, The Methodist Hospital and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Cytotherapy. 2011 Oct;13(9):1128-39. doi: 10.3109/14653249.2011.592523. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
Several studies have demonstrated that the immunogenicity of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells can be increased by manipulation of the CD40/CD40-ligand (CD40L) pathway. Although immunologic, and perhaps clinical, benefits have been obtained with an autologous CLL tumor vaccine obtained by transgenic expression of CD40L and interleukin (IL)-2, there is little information about the optimal gene transfer strategies.
We compared two different CLL vaccines prepared by adenoviral gene transfer and plasmid electroporation, analyzing their phenotype and immunostimulatory activity.
We found that higher expression of transgenic CD40L was mediated by adenoviral gene transfer than by plasmid transduction, and that adenoviral transfer of CD40L was associated with up-regulation of the co-stimulatory molecules CD80 and CD86 and adhesion molecule CD54. In contrast, transgenic IL-2 secretion was greater following plasmid transduction. These phenotypic differences in the vaccines were associated with different functionality, both ex vivo and following administration to patients. Thus adenoviral vaccines induced greater activation of leukemia-reactive T cells ex vivo than plasmid vaccines. In treated patients, specific T-cell (T helper 1 (Th1) and T helper 2 (Th2)) and humoral anti-leukemia responses were detected following administration of the adenoviral vaccine (n = 15), while recipients of the plasmid vaccine (n = 9) manifested only a low-level Th2 response. Progression-free survival at 2 years was 46.7% in the adenoviral vaccine recipients, versus 11.1 % in those receiving plasmid vaccine.
CLL vaccines expressing the same transgenes but produced by distinct methods of gene transfer may differ in the polarity of the immune response they induce in patients.
几项研究表明,通过操纵 CD40/CD40 配体(CD40L)途径可以提高慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)细胞的免疫原性。虽然通过转基因表达 CD40L 和白细胞介素(IL)-2 获得的自体 CLL 肿瘤疫苗已获得免疫和(或)临床益处,但关于最佳基因转移策略的信息很少。
我们比较了两种通过腺病毒基因转移和质粒电穿孔制备的不同 CLL 疫苗,分析了它们的表型和免疫刺激活性。
我们发现,腺病毒基因转移介导的转基因 CD40L 表达高于质粒转导,腺病毒转导 CD40L 与共刺激分子 CD80 和 CD86 以及黏附分子 CD54 的上调有关。相比之下,质粒转导后转基因 IL-2 的分泌更多。疫苗的这些表型差异与不同的功能有关,无论是在体外还是在给予患者后。因此,腺病毒疫苗在体外比质粒疫苗更能激活白血病反应性 T 细胞。在接受治疗的患者中,给予腺病毒疫苗(n = 15)后检测到特异性 T 细胞(辅助性 T 细胞 1(Th1)和辅助性 T 细胞 2(Th2))和体液抗白血病反应,而接受质粒疫苗(n = 9)的患者仅表现出低水平的 Th2 反应。腺病毒疫苗组 2 年无进展生存率为 46.7%,而质粒疫苗组为 11.1%。
表达相同转基因但通过不同基因转移方法产生的 CLL 疫苗在诱导患者产生的免疫反应极性上可能不同。