University of Oregon Trauma Healing Project, Eugene, USA.
J Marital Fam Ther. 2011 Jul;37(3):355-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2009.00179.x. Epub 2009 Dec 10.
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is known to be prevalent among therapy-seeking populations. Yet, despite a growing understanding of the dynamics of IPV and of the acceptability of screening, universal screening practices have not been systematically adopted in family therapy settings. A rapidly growing body of research data-almost entirely conducted in medical settings-has investigated attitudes and practices regarding universal screening for IPV. This article is a systematic review of the IPV universal screening research literature. The review summarizes literature related to IPV screening rates and practices, factors associated with provider screening practice, the role of training and institutional support on screening practice, impact of screening on disclosure rates, client beliefs and preferences for screening, and key safety considerations and screening competencies. Implications for family therapy and recommendations for further inquiry and screening model development are provided.
亲密伴侣暴力 (IPV) 在寻求治疗的人群中普遍存在。然而，尽管人们对 IPV 的动态及其可接受性的认识不断提高，但普遍性筛查实践并未在家庭治疗环境中得到系统采用。大量不断增长的研究数据——几乎完全是在医疗环境中进行的——调查了关于 IPV 普遍性筛查的态度和实践。本文对 IPV 普遍性筛查研究文献进行了系统回顾。综述总结了与 IPV 筛查率和实践相关的文献、与提供者筛查实践相关的因素、培训和机构支持对筛查实践的作用、筛查对披露率的影响、客户对筛查的信念和偏好，以及关键的安全考虑因素和筛查能力。为家庭治疗提供了启示，并为进一步的探究和筛查模型发展提出了建议。
