Peek-Asa Corinne, Yang Jingzhen, Hamann Cara, Young Tracy
University of Iowa Injury Prevention Research Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52241, USA.
J Burn Care Res. 2011 Jul-Aug;32(4):e135-9. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3182223f2e.
Smoke alarms are one of the most promoted prevention strategies to reduce residential fire deaths, and they can reduce residential fire deaths by half. Smoke alarm function can be measured by two tests: the smoke alarm button test and the chemical smoke test. Using results from a randomized trial of smoke alarms, we compared smoke alarm response to the button test and the smoke test. The smoke alarms found in the study homes at baseline were tested, as well as study alarms placed into homes as part of the randomized trial. Study alarms were tested at 12 and 42 months postinstallation. The proportion of alarms that passed the button test but not the smoke test ranged from 0.5 to 5.8% of alarms; this result was found most frequently among ionization alarms with zinc or alkaline batteries. These alarms would indicate to the owner (through the button test) that the smoke alarm was working, but the alarm would not actually respond in the case of a fire (as demonstrated by failing the smoke test). The proportion of alarms that passed the smoke test but not the button test ranged from 1.0 to 3.0%. These alarms would appear nonfunctional to the owner (because the button test failed), even though the alarm would operate in response to a fire (as demonstrated by passing the smoke test). The general public is not aware of the potential for inaccuracy in smoke alarm tests, and burn professionals can advocate for enhanced testing methods. The optimal test to determine smoke alarm function is the chemical smoke test.
烟雾报警器是为减少住宅火灾死亡人数而推广最多的预防策略之一,它能将住宅火灾死亡人数减半。烟雾报警器的功能可以通过两种测试来衡量:烟雾报警器按钮测试和化学烟雾测试。利用烟雾报警器随机试验的结果,我们比较了烟雾报警器对按钮测试和烟雾测试的响应情况。对研究开始时在住宅中发现的烟雾报警器以及作为随机试验一部分安装到住宅中的研究用报警器进行了测试。研究用报警器在安装后12个月和42个月进行了测试。通过按钮测试但未通过烟雾测试的报警器比例在报警器总数的0.5%至5.8%之间;这一结果在使用锌电池或碱性电池的离子型报警器中最为常见。这些报警器会(通过按钮测试)向业主表明烟雾报警器在正常工作,但在火灾发生时报警器实际上不会响应(烟雾测试未通过即证明了这一点)。通过烟雾测试但未通过按钮测试的报警器比例在1.0%至3.0%之间。这些报警器对业主来说似乎无法正常工作(因为按钮测试未通过),尽管报警器会对火灾做出响应(烟雾测试通过即证明了这一点)。公众并未意识到烟雾报警器测试可能存在不准确的情况,烧伤专业人员可以倡导采用改进的测试方法。确定烟雾报警器功能的最佳测试是化学烟雾测试。