Institute of Hospital and Health Care Administration, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e14824. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014824. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
The free choice of health care facilities without limitations on frequency of visits within the National Health Insurance in Taiwan gives rise to not only a high number of annual ambulatory visits per capita but also a unique "one-stop shopping"phenomenon, which refers to a patient' visits to several specialties of the same healthcare facility in one day. The visits to multiple physicians would increase the potential risk of polypharmacy. The aim of this study was to analyze the frequency and patterns of one-stop visits in Taiwan.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The claims datasets of 1 million nationally representative people within Taiwan's National Health Insurance in 2005 were used to calculate the number of patients with one-stop visits. The frequent itemsets mining was applied to compute the combination patterns of specialties in the one-stop visits. Among the total 13,682,469 ambulatory care visits in 2005, one-stop visits occurred 144,132 times and involved 296,822 visits (2.2% of all visits) by 66,294 (6.6%) persons. People tended to have this behavior with age and the percentage reached 27.5% (5,662 in 20,579) in the age group ≥80 years. In general, women were more likely to have one-stop visits than men (7.2% vs. 6.0%). Internal medicine plus ophthalmology was the most frequent combination with a visited frequency of 3,552 times (2.5%), followed by cardiology plus neurology with 3,183 times (2.2%). The most frequent three-specialty combination, cardiology plus neurology and gastroenterology, occurred only 111 times.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Without the novel computational technique, it would be hardly possible to analyze the extremely diverse combination patterns of specialties in one-stop visits. The results of the study could provide useful information either for the hospital manager to set up integrated services or for the policymaker to rebuild the health care system.
台湾的全民健康保险制度允许人们自由选择医疗机构,且不限定就诊次数,这不仅导致了人均年门诊就诊次数居高不下,还出现了独特的“一站式就诊”现象,即患者在一天内到同一家医疗机构的多个科室就诊。这种情况下,患者可能会接受多位医生的治疗,从而增加了药物滥用的风险。本研究旨在分析台湾“一站式就诊”的频率和模式。
方法/主要发现:我们使用了 2005 年台湾全民健康保险系统中 100 万具有代表性的参保人的理赔数据集来计算“一站式就诊”的患者人数。我们应用频繁项集挖掘技术来计算“一站式就诊”中各科室组合的模式。在 2005 年的 13682469 次门诊就诊中,“一站式就诊”共发生 144132 次,涉及 296822 次就诊(占总就诊次数的 2.2%),涉及 66294 名(占就诊总人数的 6.6%)患者。“一站式就诊”的发生率随年龄增长而增加,在≥80 岁的年龄组中达到 27.5%(5662 例就诊中有 20579 例)。一般来说,女性“一站式就诊”的比例高于男性(7.2%比 6.0%)。内科加眼科是最常见的组合,就诊次数为 3552 次(占 2.5%),其次是心内科加神经内科,就诊次数为 3183 次(占 2.2%)。最常见的三联科组合,即心内科加神经内科和消化内科,仅出现了 111 次。
结论/意义:如果没有新颖的计算技术,分析“一站式就诊”中极其多样化的科室组合模式是几乎不可能的。本研究结果可为医院管理者提供整合服务的有用信息,也可为政策制定者提供重建医疗体系的参考。