Suppr超能文献

两种不同剂量瑞芬太尼输注用于体外受精术镇静效果的比较。

Comparison of the effects of 2 different doses of remifentanil infusion for sedation during in-vitro fertilization procedure.

作者信息

Sarikaya Huriye B, Iyilikci Leyla, Gulekli Bulent, Posaci Cemal, Erbil Dogan O, Ok Elvan, Eglen Merih, Ellidokuz Hulya, Gunerli Ali

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Dokuz Eylul University, School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.

出版信息

Saudi Med J. 2011 Jul;32(7):689-94.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the sedation level, hemodynamic effects, patient and physician satisfactions following sedation achieved by 2 different doses of remifentanil (R) infusion with additional bolus infusions of propofol for in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedure.

METHODS

A double-blind prospective randomized study was implemented on 86 ASA I-II grade female patients, 18-40 years of age that underwent IVF procedure. This study was performed in the Department of Anesthesiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey between November 2006 to August 2008. Group R1 received 0.1 mcg/kg/min while Group R2 received 0.15 mcg/kg/min infusion dose remifentanil. Side effects, total doses of remifentanil and propofol administered, heart rate (HR), systolic arterial pressure and diastolic arterial pressure values have been recorded. Fertilization, cleavage, and pregnancy rates together with prognosis of pregnancies were compared.

RESULTS

Groups did not show statistically significant differences for hemodynamic parameters of HR and MAP (p = 0.281). Comparison of the satisfaction levels of 2 groups showed that anesthesiologist satisfaction was superior in R1 (p = 0.009) whereas surgeon satisfaction was superior in R2 (p = 0.01). Both groups reported good patient satisfaction levels (p = 0.31). There were no differences between the groups in terms of fertilization, cleavage, pregnancy rates and prognosis of pregnancies (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Both doses of remifentanil provided stable hemodynamics along with fast and uncomplicated recovery.

摘要

目的

比较两种不同剂量瑞芬太尼(R)输注并额外推注丙泊酚用于体外受精(IVF)手术时的镇静水平、血流动力学效应、患者及医生满意度。

方法

对86例年龄在18至40岁、接受IVF手术的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)I-II级女性患者进行双盲前瞻性随机研究。该研究于2006年11月至2008年8月在土耳其伊兹密尔多库兹艾吕尔大学医学院麻醉科及妇产科进行。R1组接受0.1微克/千克/分钟的瑞芬太尼输注剂量,而R2组接受0.15微克/千克/分钟的输注剂量。记录副作用、瑞芬太尼和丙泊酚的总给药剂量、心率(HR)、收缩压和舒张压值。比较受精率、卵裂率、妊娠率以及妊娠预后。

结果

两组在HR和MAP的血流动力学参数方面未显示出统计学显著差异(p = 0.281)。两组满意度比较显示,R1组麻醉医生满意度更高(p = 0.009),而R2组外科医生满意度更高(p = 0.01)。两组患者满意度均较高(p = 0.31)。两组在受精率、卵裂率、妊娠率及妊娠预后方面无差异(p>0.05)。

结论

两种剂量的瑞芬太尼均能提供稳定的血流动力学,恢复快速且无并发症。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验