Rosen J M, Padilla J A, Nguyen K D, Padilla M A, Sabelman E E, Pham H N
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA 94305.
Ann Plast Surg. 1990 Nov;25(5):375-87. doi: 10.1097/00000637-199011000-00006.
A study was conducted to compare the regeneration of rat peroneal nerves across 0.5-cm gaps repaired with artificial nerve grafts versus sutured autografts. The artificial nerve graft model is composed of a synthetic biodegradable passive conduit made of polyglycolic acid filled with a collagen extracellular matrix (predominantly Type I collagen, derived from calf skin, and with the telopeptide ends left intact). Axonal regeneration was studied in 22 long-term animals (11 or 12 months). The nerves were studied by qualitative and quantitative histological and electrophysiological methods, and by functional analysis in 9 of the animals. The axonal regeneration of the artificial nerve graft is equal to sutured autografts as measured by axonal counts, and by physiological and functional methods, although the sutured autografts demonstrated statistically superior axonal diameters.
进行了一项研究,以比较用人工神经移植物修复0.5厘米间隙的大鼠腓总神经与缝合自体移植物的神经再生情况。人工神经移植物模型由聚乙醇酸制成的合成可生物降解被动导管组成,内部填充有胶原蛋白细胞外基质(主要是来自小牛皮肤的I型胶原蛋白,且端肽末端保持完整)。对22只长期存活的动物(11或12个月)进行了轴突再生研究。通过定性和定量组织学及电生理方法对神经进行研究,并对其中9只动物进行了功能分析。通过轴突计数、生理和功能方法测量,人工神经移植物的轴突再生与缝合自体移植物相当,尽管缝合自体移植物在统计学上显示出更优越的轴突直径。