School of Psychology, Keele University, Keele, UK School of Psychology, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Br J Psychol. 2011 Aug;102(3):559-68. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02017.x. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
Several studies have used the lexical decision task (LDT) with the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) false-memory paradigm to investigate whether long-term semantic priming (LTSP) occurs following presentation of lists of items (e.g., bed, dream, snore) for related non-presented lure words (e.g., sleep). However, results have been mixed, with some studies observing priming, whilst others have not. The present study had four goals: (i) to investigate the existence of LTSP in the LDT; (ii) to investigate effects of LTSP on standard effects of word frequency on LDT performance; (iii) to investigate the effect, if any, of word frequency on true and false recall; and (iv) to compare LDT performance with performance on a subsequent free-recall task. The findings showed (i) a significant effect of LTSP on LDT performance; (ii) no effect of LTSP on standard effects of word frequency on LDT performance; (iii) no effect of word frequency on either true or false free recall; and (iv) a significant relationship between LDT and free-recall performance. Implications of these findings for understanding LTSP and false memories are discussed.
几项研究使用词汇判断任务 (LDT) 和 Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) 虚假记忆范式来调查在呈现项目列表(例如,床、梦、打鼾)后是否会发生长期语义启动 (LTSP) 与相关的未呈现诱饵词(例如,睡眠)。然而,结果喜忧参半,有些研究观察到启动,而有些则没有。本研究有四个目标:(i)调查 LDT 中 LTSP 的存在;(ii)调查 LTSP 对 LDT 性能的词频标准效应的影响;(iii)调查词频对真实和虚假回忆的影响;以及 (iv) 将 LDT 性能与随后的自由回忆任务的性能进行比较。研究结果表明:(i) LTSP 对 LDT 性能有显著影响;(ii) LTSP 对 LDT 性能的词频标准效应没有影响;(iii) 词频对真实和虚假自由回忆均无影响;以及 (iv) LDT 和自由回忆表现之间存在显著关系。讨论了这些发现对理解 LTSP 和虚假记忆的意义。