Suppr超能文献

DRM 范式下在迫选测试中的真实记忆和虚假记忆。

True and false memories in the DRM paradigm on a forced choice test.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Washington University in St. Louis, MO 63105, USA.

出版信息

Memory. 2010 May;18(4):375-84. doi: 10.1080/09658211003685533. Epub 2010 Apr 19.

Abstract

Participants studied lists of semantic associates that converged on a non-presented critical word (e.g., sleep; Deese, 1959; Roediger & McDermott, 1995) and took a two-alternative forced choice test. At test, each critical non-presented word was paired with a studied word from the same list. The test was administered either immediately or 7 days after the study phase. Accuracy in distinguishing between the non-presented critical word and the studied list word was above chance at immediate testing. After a 7-day retention interval, however, accuracy did not differ from chance performance: participants were as likely to choose the non-presented critical word as the studied list word.

摘要

参与者研究了与一个未呈现的关键单词(例如 sleep;Deese,1959;Roediger & McDermott,1995)相关的语义联想词列表,并进行了二选一的强制选择测试。在测试中,每个未呈现的关键非单词都与同一列表中的一个学习单词配对。测试在学习阶段后立即或 7 天后进行。在即时测试中,区分未呈现的关键单词和学习列表单词的准确性高于随机水平。然而,在 7 天的保留间隔后,准确性与随机表现没有差异:参与者选择未呈现的关键单词和学习列表单词的可能性相同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验