Suppr超能文献

测试诱导启动效应在错误记忆的产生中起作用吗?

Does test-induced priming play a role in the creation of false memories?

作者信息

Marsh Elizabeth J, McDermott Kathleen B, Roediger Henry L

机构信息

Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

Memory. 2004 Jan;12(1):44-55. doi: 10.1080/09658210244000405.

Abstract

We investigated the role of test-induced priming in creating false memories in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm, in which subjects study lists of related words (bed, rest, awake) and then falsely recall or recognise a related word (sleep) on a later test. However, in experiments using three different procedures, we found that the number of related words tested prior to the critical word had surprisingly little impact on false recall and recognition. We manipulated the location of the critical item in tests of yes/no recognition, word-stem cued recall, and part-set cued recall. We consistently obtained high probabilities of false recall and recognition, but the probability was unaffected by the number of related items presented prior to the test of the critical item. Surprisingly, test-induced priming of the critical item does not seem to play a large role in this memory illusion.

摘要

我们研究了在迪ese/罗迪格 - 麦克德莫特(DRM)范式中,测试诱导启动在产生错误记忆方面的作用。在该范式中,受试者学习一系列相关单词(如“床”“休息”“醒着”),然后在后续测试中错误地回忆或识别出一个相关单词(如“睡眠”)。然而,在使用三种不同程序的实验中,我们发现,在关键单词之前测试的相关单词数量对错误回忆和识别的影响出奇地小。我们在是/否识别测试、词干线索回忆测试和部分集合线索回忆测试中操纵了关键项目的位置。我们始终获得了较高的错误回忆和识别概率,但该概率不受在关键项目测试之前呈现的相关项目数量的影响。令人惊讶的是,测试诱导的关键项目启动似乎在这种记忆错觉中并不起很大作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验