• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

申请人在实际人员选拔中的反应和造假。

Applicant reactions and faking in real-life personnel selection.

机构信息

Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FIOH), Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Scand J Psychol. 2011 Aug;52(4):376-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2011.00892.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2011.00892.x
PMID:21752026
Abstract

Faking may affect hiring decisions in personnel selection. All the antecedents of faking are still not known. The present study investigates the association between applicants' reactions about the selection procedure and their tendency to fake. The subjects (N = 180) were real-life applicants for a fire and rescue personnel school. After completing the selection process, the applicants filled out a questionnaire about their test reactions (Chan, Schmitt, Sacco & DeSohon, 1998b) and a faking scale, the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (Paulhus, 1991). The results based on Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) indicated that the more positive reactions applicant had about the selection procedure the more impression management they had. The applicant reactions were not associated with self-deception.

摘要

造假可能会影响人员选拔中的招聘决策。目前还不完全了解所有造假的前因。本研究调查了申请人对选拔程序的反应与他们造假倾向之间的关系。研究对象(N=180)是消防和救援人员学校的真实申请人。完成选拔过程后,申请人填写了一份关于他们测试反应的问卷(Chan、Schmitt、Sacco 和 DeSohon,1998b)和一份造假量表,即平衡的理想反应量表(Paulhus,1991)。基于结构方程建模(SEM)的结果表明,申请人对选拔程序的反应越积极,他们的印象管理就越积极。申请人的反应与自我欺骗无关。

相似文献

1
Applicant reactions and faking in real-life personnel selection.申请人在实际人员选拔中的反应和造假。
Scand J Psychol. 2011 Aug;52(4):376-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2011.00892.x.
2
Retesting personality in employee selection: implications of the context, sample, and setting.员工选拔中的人格再测试:情境、样本和环境的影响
Psychol Rep. 2013 Apr;112(2):486-501. doi: 10.2466/03.01.PR0.112.2.486-501.
3
Faking and the validity of conscientiousness: a Monte Carlo investigation.伪装与尽责性的有效性:蒙特卡洛调查
J Appl Psychol. 2008 Jan;93(1):140-54. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.140.
4
Effects of impression management and self-deception on the predictive validity of personality constructs.印象管理和自我欺骗对人格构念预测效度的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 1996 Jun;81(3):261-72. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.81.3.261.
5
The influence of item order on intentional response distortion in the assessment of high potentials: assessing pilot applicants.项目顺序对评估高潜力人才时故意反应失真的影响:评估试点申请人。
Int J Psychol. 2014 Apr;49(2):131-9. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12015. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
6
Item placement on a personality measure: effects on faking behavior and test measurement properties.人格测量中的项目编排:对伪装行为和测试测量属性的影响。
J Pers Assess. 2002 Apr;78(2):348-69. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7802_09.
7
Deliberate faking on personality and emotional intelligence measures.在人格和情商测量中故意伪装。
Psychol Rep. 2011 Feb;108(1):120-38. doi: 10.2466/03.09.28.PR0.108.1.120-138.
8
The Psychometric Costs of Applicants' Faking: Examining Measurement Invariance and Retest Correlations Across Response Conditions.求职者伪装的心理测量成本:检验不同反应条件下的测量不变性和重测相关性。
J Pers Assess. 2017 Sep-Oct;99(5):510-523. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2017.1285781. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
9
Retesting after initial failure, coaching rumors, and warnings against faking in online personality measures for selection.初始失败后的重测、关于谣言的辅导、以及反对在在线人格测量中伪造以进行选拔的警告。
J Appl Psychol. 2011 Jan;96(1):202-10. doi: 10.1037/a0020375.
10
Demand effects on positive response distortion by police officer applicants on the Revised NEO Personality Inventory.需求效应对修订版 NEO 人格量表中警察申请者积极反应偏差的影响。
J Pers Assess. 2010 Sep;92(5):410-5. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2010.497401.

引用本文的文献

1
Integration of the Forced-Choice Questionnaire and the Likert Scale: A Simulation Study.强制选择问卷与李克特量表的整合:一项模拟研究。
Front Psychol. 2017 May 18;8:806. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00806. eCollection 2017.
2
Testing the Level of Social Desirability During Job Interview on White-Collar Profession.测试白领职业求职面试中的社会赞许性水平。
Front Psychol. 2015 Dec 15;6:1886. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01886. eCollection 2015.