State Key Laboratory for Molecular Virology and Genetic Engineering, Institute of Pathogen Biology at Beijing and The Institute of Blood Transfusion at Chengdu, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, 100730 China.
Virology. 2011 Sep 1;417(2):327-33. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2011.06.009. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
AAV1 and AAV6 are two closely related AAV serotypes. In the present study, we found AAV6 was more efficient in transducing mouse lower airway epithelia in vitro and in vivo than AAV1. To further explore the mechanism of this difference, we found that significantly more AAV1 bound to mouse airway epithelia than AAV6, yet transduction by AAV6 was far superior. Lectin competition assays demonstrated that both AAV1 and AAV6 similarly utilize α-2, 3-, and to a lesser extend α-2, 6- linked sialic acids as the receptors for transduction. Furthermore, the rates of AAV endocytosis could not account for the transduction differences of AAV1 and AAV6. Finally, it was revealed that AAV6 was less susceptible to ubiquitin/proteasome-mediated blocks than AAV1 when transducing mouse airway epithelia. Thus compared with AAV1, AAV6 has a unique ability to escape proteasome-mediated degradation, which is likely responsible for its higher transduction efficiency in mouse airway epithelium.
AAV1 和 AAV6 是两种密切相关的 AAV 血清型。在本研究中,我们发现 AAV6 在体外和体内转导小鼠下呼吸道上皮细胞的效率均高于 AAV1。为了进一步探讨这种差异的机制,我们发现 AAV1 与小鼠气道上皮的结合量明显多于 AAV6,但 AAV6 的转导效率却远高于 AAV1。凝集素竞争实验表明,AAV1 和 AAV6 均以α-2,3-和α-2,6-连接的唾液酸作为转导的受体,其作用相似。此外,AAV 的内吞作用速率并不能解释 AAV1 和 AAV6 的转导差异。最后,结果表明,在转导小鼠气道上皮细胞时,AAV6 比 AAV1 更不易受到泛素/蛋白酶体介导的阻断。因此,与 AAV1 相比,AAV6 具有独特的逃避蛋白酶体介导降解的能力,这可能是其在小鼠气道上皮中更高转导效率的原因。