• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Smokers' self-reported responses to the introduction of reduced ignition propensity (RIP) cigarettes.吸烟者对低点燃倾向(RIP)香烟引入的自我报告反应。
Tob Control. 2012 May;21(3):337-40. doi: 10.1136/tc.2011.043257. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
2
Smokers' reactions to reduced ignition propensity cigarettes.吸烟者对降低点燃倾向香烟的反应。
Tob Control. 2006 Feb;15(1):45-9. doi: 10.1136/tc.2005.013532.
3
Effect of the New York State cigarette fire safety standard on ignition propensity, smoke constituents, and the consumer market.纽约州香烟消防安全标准对点燃倾向、烟雾成分及消费市场的影响。
Tob Control. 2005 Oct;14(5):321-7. doi: 10.1136/tc.2005.011759.
4
The impact of reduced ignition propensity cigarette regulation on smoking behaviour in a cohort of Ontario smokers.减少点火倾向香烟法规对安大略省吸烟者吸烟行为的影响。
Inj Prev. 2010 Dec;16(6):420-2. doi: 10.1136/ip.2009.025114. Epub 2010 Jul 19.
5
Does switching to reduced ignition propensity cigarettes alter smoking behavior or exposure to tobacco smoke constituents?改为低引燃倾向香烟是否会改变吸烟行为或暴露于烟草烟雾成分?
Nicotine Tob Res. 2010 Oct;12(10):1011-8. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntq139. Epub 2010 Aug 30.
6
Impact of reduced ignition propensity cigarette regulation on consumer smoking behavior and quit intentions: evidence from 6 waves (2004-11) of the ITC Four Country Survey.降低易点燃性卷烟监管对消费者吸烟行为及戒烟意愿的影响:来自国际烟草控制四国调查6轮(2004 - 2011年)的证据
Tob Induc Dis. 2013 Dec 21;11(1):26. doi: 10.1186/1617-9625-11-26.
7
Smokers' misperceptions of light and ultra-light cigarettes may keep them smoking.吸烟者对淡味和超淡味香烟的误解可能会使他们继续吸烟。
Am J Prev Med. 1998 Jul;15(1):9-16. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00004-x.
8
Hand rolling cigarette papers as the reference point for regulating cigarette fire safety.手卷烟纸作为规范卷烟消防安全的参考标准。
Tob Control. 2003 Dec;12(4):406-10. doi: 10.1136/tc.12.4.406.
9
Relation between newspaper coverage of 'light' cigarette litigation and beliefs about 'lights' among American adolescents and young adults: the impact on risk perceptions and quitting intentions.报纸对“淡味”香烟诉讼的报道与美国青少年和年轻人对“淡味”香烟的看法之间的关系:对风险认知和戒烟意愿的影响。
Tob Control. 2010 Aug;19(4):267-73. doi: 10.1136/tc.2009.032029. Epub 2010 Jun 7.
10
Are fire safe cigarettes actually fire safe? Evidence from changes in US state laws.安全香烟真的安全吗?来自美国州法律变化的证据。
Inj Prev. 2018 Jun;24(3):193-198. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2017-042322. Epub 2017 Jun 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of the cigarette ignition propensity standard in preventing unintentional residential fires in Massachusetts.马萨诸塞州防止非蓄意住宅火灾的香烟点火倾向标准的有效性。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Apr;104(4):e56-61. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301837. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
2
Impact of reduced ignition propensity cigarette regulation on consumer smoking behavior and quit intentions: evidence from 6 waves (2004-11) of the ITC Four Country Survey.降低易点燃性卷烟监管对消费者吸烟行为及戒烟意愿的影响:来自国际烟草控制四国调查6轮(2004 - 2011年)的证据
Tob Induc Dis. 2013 Dec 21;11(1):26. doi: 10.1186/1617-9625-11-26.

本文引用的文献

1
Ignition strength of 25 international cigarette brands.25 个国际卷烟品牌的引燃强度。
Tob Control. 2011 Jan;20(1):77-80. doi: 10.1136/tc.2010.036392. Epub 2010 Oct 24.
2
Does switching to reduced ignition propensity cigarettes alter smoking behavior or exposure to tobacco smoke constituents?改为低引燃倾向香烟是否会改变吸烟行为或暴露于烟草烟雾成分?
Nicotine Tob Res. 2010 Oct;12(10):1011-8. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntq139. Epub 2010 Aug 30.
3
The impact of reduced ignition propensity cigarette regulation on smoking behaviour in a cohort of Ontario smokers.减少点火倾向香烟法规对安大略省吸烟者吸烟行为的影响。
Inj Prev. 2010 Dec;16(6):420-2. doi: 10.1136/ip.2009.025114. Epub 2010 Jul 19.
4
Nicotine addiction.尼古丁成瘾
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jun 17;362(24):2295-303. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0809890.
5
Recent Advances in Cigarette Ignition Propensity Research and Development.卷烟燃烧倾向研究与开发的最新进展
Fire Technol. 2010 Apr 1;46(2):275-289. doi: 10.1007/s10694-008-0070-8.
6
Assessing consumer responses to potential reduced-exposure tobacco products: a review of tobacco industry and independent research methods.评估消费者对潜在减害烟草产品的反应:对烟草业和独立研究方法的综述。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Dec;18(12):3225-40. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0946.
7
The reliability and validity of self-reported puffing behavior: evidence from a cross-national study.自我报告的吸烟行为的可靠性和有效性:一项跨国研究的证据。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2008 May;10(5):867-74. doi: 10.1080/14622200802027156.
8
The role of sensory perception in the development and targeting of tobacco products.感官感知在烟草产品开发及定位中的作用。
Addiction. 2007 Jan;102(1):136-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01649.x.
9
Smokers' reactions to reduced ignition propensity cigarettes.吸烟者对降低点燃倾向香烟的反应。
Tob Control. 2006 Feb;15(1):45-9. doi: 10.1136/tc.2005.013532.
10
Nicotine and nonnicotine factors in cigarette addiction.香烟成瘾中的尼古丁和非尼古丁因素。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006 Mar;184(3-4):274-85. doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-0250-x. Epub 2005 Dec 16.

吸烟者对低点燃倾向(RIP)香烟引入的自我报告反应。

Smokers' self-reported responses to the introduction of reduced ignition propensity (RIP) cigarettes.

机构信息

Center for Global Tobacco Control, Department of Society, Human Development and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Landmark Center, Third Floor East, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.

出版信息

Tob Control. 2012 May;21(3):337-40. doi: 10.1136/tc.2011.043257. Epub 2011 Jul 12.

DOI:10.1136/tc.2011.043257
PMID:21752794
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4528372/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Changes in cigarette design to meet mandated fire safety standards may have unintended effects on smoker responses by diminishing the consumer's perceptions of product acceptability, smoking and increasing fire-risk behaviours. To address these concerns, population-level data are needed from a jurisdiction where reduced ignition propensity (RIP) cigarettes have been introduced.

METHODS

A cohort of adult smokers was recruited in Massachusetts, U.S.A. using a random-digit-dialed telephone survey. The cohort was contacted prior to, and 8 months following, the state-mandated introduction of RIP cigarettes on 1 January 2008. Changes in self-reported subjective cigarette characteristics, smoking topography, fire-risk behaviours, fire events and quitting intentions were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 620 Massachusetts smokers completed the baseline survey conducted prior to implementation of the law, and 353 (57%) completed the follow-up survey conducted after implementation. No significant changes were found in self-reported fire-risk behaviour or quitting intentions. In addition, smokers were less likely to report smoking greater than 20 cigarettes per day and inhaling deeply into the chest after the law.

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of RIP cigarettes in Massachusetts yielded little change, and no adverse effect, on self-reported smoker response, among a sample of mostly Caucasian smokers.

摘要

背景

为满足强制性消防安全标准而改变香烟设计可能会对吸烟者的反应产生意想不到的影响,降低消费者对产品可接受性、吸烟和增加火灾风险行为的认知。为了解决这些问题,需要从已经引入低点燃倾向(RIP)香烟的管辖区获得人群水平数据。

方法

在美国马萨诸塞州,使用随机数字拨号电话调查招募了一组成年吸烟者。该队列在 2008 年 1 月 1 日州强制引入 RIP 香烟之前和之后 8 个月进行了联系。评估了自我报告的主观香烟特征、吸烟模式、火灾风险行为、火灾事件和戒烟意愿的变化。

结果

共有 620 名马萨诸塞州吸烟者完成了在法律实施前进行的基线调查,其中 353 名(57%)完成了在法律实施后进行的随访调查。自我报告的火灾风险行为或戒烟意愿没有明显变化。此外,吸烟者报告每天吸烟超过 20 支和深吸到胸部的情况在法律实施后减少。

结论

在马萨诸塞州引入 RIP 香烟后,在一个主要由白种人吸烟者组成的样本中,对自我报告的吸烟者反应几乎没有变化,也没有产生不利影响。