University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.
Br J Anaesth. 2011 Nov;107(5):796-805. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer220. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
There is a need for a bedside functional residual capacity (FRC) measurement method that performs well in intensive care patients during many modes of ventilation including controlled, assisted, spontaneous, and mixed. We developed a modified multiple breath nitrogen washout method for FRC measurement that relies on end-tidal gas fractions and alveolar tidal volume measurements as inputs but does not require the traditional measurements of volume of nitrogen or oxygen. Using end-tidal measurements, not volume, reduces errors from signal synchronization. This study was designed to assess the accuracy, precision, and repeatability of the proposed FRC system in subjects with variable ventilation patterns including some spontaneous effort.
The accuracy and precision of measurements were assessed by comparing the novel N₂ washout FRC values to the gold standard, body plethysmography, in 20 spontaneously breathing volunteers. Repeatability was assessed by comparing subsequent measurements in 20 intensive care patients whose lungs were under controlled and assisted mechanical ventilation.
Compared with body plethysmography, the accuracy (mean bias) of the novel method was -0.004 litre and precision [1 standard deviation (sd)] was 0.209 litre [mean (sd)] [-0.1 (5.9)% of body plethysmography]. The difference between repeated measurements was 0.009 (0.15) litre [mean (sd)] [0.4 (6.4)%]. The coefficient of repeatability was 0.31 litre (12.7%).
The modified multiple breath nitrogen washout method for FRC measurement provides improved precision and equivalent accuracy and repeatability compared with existing methods during ventilation with variable ventilation patterns. Further study of the novel N₂ washout method is needed.
需要有一种在多种通气模式下(包括控制、辅助、自主和混合通气)都能在重症监护患者中表现良好的床边功能残气量(FRC)测量方法。我们开发了一种改良的多次呼吸氮气清除法来测量 FRC,该方法依赖于呼气末气体分数和肺泡潮气量测量作为输入,但不需要传统的氮气或氧气体积测量。使用呼气末测量值,而不是体积,可减少信号同步误差。本研究旨在评估该 FRC 系统在具有不同通气模式的受试者中的准确性、精密度和可重复性,包括一些自主努力。
通过将新型 N₂ 清除 FRC 值与金标准(体描法)比较,评估了测量的准确性和精密度,共纳入 20 名自主呼吸的志愿者。通过比较 20 名接受控制和辅助机械通气的重症监护患者的后续测量值,评估了重复性。
与体描法相比,新型方法的准确性(平均偏差)为-0.004 升,精密度(1 个标准差)为 0.209 升[平均值(标准差)] [-0.1(5.9)%的体描法]。重复测量之间的差异为 0.009(0.15)升[平均值(标准差)] [0.4(6.4)%]。可重复性系数为 0.31 升(12.7%)。
改良的多次呼吸氮气清除法用于 FRC 测量,与现有方法相比,在具有可变通气模式的通气中提供了更高的精度和等效的准确性和可重复性。需要进一步研究新型 N₂ 清除法。