Health and Rehabilitation Sciences Research Institute and School of Health Sciences, Northern Ireland.
Clin J Pain. 2012 Mar-Apr;28(3):259-67. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3182274018.
To evaluate the feasibility of a randomized-controlled trial (RCT) investigating the effects of adding auricular acupuncture (AA) to exercise for participants with chronic low-back pain (CLBP).
Participants with CLBP were recruited from primary care and a university population and were randomly allocated (n=51) to 1 of 2 groups: (1) "Exercise Alone (E)"-12-week program consisting of 6 weeks of supervised exercise followed by 6 weeks unsupervised exercise (n=27); or (2) "Exercise and AA (EAA)"-12-week exercise program and AA (n=24). Outcome measures were recorded at baseline, week 8, week 13, and 6 months. The primary outcome measure was the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire.
Participants in the EAA group demonstrated a greater mean improvement of 10.7% points (95% confidence interval, -15.3,-5.7) (effect size=1.20) in the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire at 6 months compared with 6.7% points (95% confidence interval, -11.4,-1.9) in the E group (effect size=0.58). There was also a trend towards a greater mean improvement in quality of life, LBP intensity and bothersomeness, and fear-avoidance beliefs in the EAA group. The dropout rate for this trial was lower than anticipated (15% at 6 mo), adherence with exercise was similar (72% E; 65% EAA). Adverse effects for AA ranged from 1% to 14% of participants.
Findings of this study showed that a main RCT is feasible and that 56 participants per group would need to be recruited, using multiple recruitment approaches. AA was safe and demonstrated additional benefits when combined with exercise for people with CLBP, which requires confirmation in a fully powered RCT.
评估一项随机对照试验(RCT)的可行性,该试验旨在研究在慢性下腰痛(CLBP)患者中添加耳针(AA)对运动的影响。
从初级保健和大学人群中招募 CLBP 患者,并将其随机分配(n=51)至以下 2 组之一:(1)“仅运动(E)”-12 周的计划,包括 6 周的监督运动,然后是 6 周的非监督运动(n=27);或(2)“运动和 AA(EAA)”-12 周的运动计划和 AA(n=24)。在基线、第 8 周、第 13 周和 6 个月时记录结果测量值。主要结果测量指标为 Oswestry 残疾问卷。
EAA 组的参与者在 6 个月时 Oswestry 残疾问卷的平均改善程度为 10.7%(95%置信区间,-15.3,-5.7)(效应量=1.20),而 E 组的平均改善程度为 6.7%(95%置信区间,-11.4,-1.9)(效应量=0.58)。EAA 组的生活质量、腰痛强度和困扰、恐惧回避信念也有改善趋势。本试验的退出率低于预期(6 个月时为 15%),运动依从性相似(E 组为 72%;EAA 组为 65%)。AA 的不良反应发生率为 1%至 14%的参与者。
本研究结果表明,一项主要 RCT 是可行的,需要使用多种招募方法招募每组 56 名参与者。AA 是安全的,并且当与 CLBP 患者的运动相结合时表现出额外的益处,这需要在完全有效的 RCT 中得到证实。