Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Phys Ther. 2012 Mar;92(3):363-77. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20110290. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
Motor control exercises to improve control and coordination of trunk muscles and graded activity under the principles of cognitive-behavioral therapy are 2 commonly used exercise therapies, yet there is little evidence to support the use of one intervention over the other.
The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of motor control exercises and graded activity for patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain.
This study was a prospectively registered randomized controlled trial with outcome assessment and statistical analyses conducted blind to group.
The study was conducted in primary care settings.
The participants were 172 patients with chronic (>12 weeks) nonspecific low back pain.
Patients were randomly assigned to receive either motor control exercises or graded activity. There was no attempt to subclassify patients to match them to a treatment. Patients in both groups received 14 sessions of individualized, supervised exercise therapy.
Primary outcomes were average pain over the previous week (numeric rating scale) and function (Patient-Specific Functional Scale); secondary outcomes were disability (24-item Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire), global impression of change (Global Perceived Effect Scale), and quality of life (36-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire [SF-36]). Outcome measures were collected at baseline and at 2, 6, and 12 months after intervention.
A linear mixed models analysis showed that there were no significant differences between treatment groups at any of the time points for any of the outcomes studied. For example, the effect for pain at 2 months was 0.0 (-0.7 to 0.8).
Clinicians could not be blinded to the interventions.
results of this study suggest that motor control exercises and graded activity have similar effects for patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain.
改善躯干肌肉控制和协调性的运动控制练习和基于认知行为疗法的分级活动是两种常用的运动疗法,但几乎没有证据支持一种干预措施优于另一种。
本研究旨在比较运动控制练习和分级活动对慢性非特异性下腰痛患者的疗效。
这是一项前瞻性登记的随机对照试验,对结果进行评估和统计分析,并对组进行盲法。
该研究在初级保健环境中进行。
参与者为 172 例慢性(>12 周)非特异性下腰痛患者。
患者随机分配接受运动控制练习或分级活动。没有尝试对患者进行亚分类以匹配他们的治疗。两组患者均接受 14 次个体化、监督的运动治疗。
主要结局指标为过去一周的平均疼痛(数字评分量表)和功能(患者特定功能量表);次要结局指标为残疾(24 项 Roland-Morris 残疾问卷)、总体变化印象(总体感知效果量表)和生活质量(36 项简明健康调查问卷[SF-36])。在干预前、干预后 2、6 和 12 个月时收集了这些结果。
线性混合模型分析表明,在任何时间点,任何研究结果在治疗组之间均无显著差异。例如,2 个月时疼痛的效应为 0.0(-0.7 至 0.8)。
临床医生无法对干预措施进行盲法。
本研究结果表明,运动控制练习和分级活动对慢性非特异性下腰痛患者的疗效相似。