Suppr超能文献

咽-喉切除术伴游离空肠移植重建和气管食管语音恢复:Provox 2 语音假体的替代指征、微生物定植和留置时间。

Pharyngolaryngectomy with free jejunal autograft reconstruction and tracheoesophageal voice restoration: Indications for replacements, microbial colonization, and indwelling times of the Provox 2 voice prostheses.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Division of Phoniatrics-Logopedics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Head Neck. 2011 Aug;33(8):1144-53. doi: 10.1002/hed.21590. Epub 2010 Nov 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this prospective study was to investigate shunt-related and device-related complications and microbial colonization of voice prostheses in patients after pharyngolaryngectomy with jejunal autograft reconstruction in comparison to patients after standard laryngectomy.

METHODS

Nine patients after pharyngolaryngectomy with jejunal autograft reconstruction (group 1) and 14 patients after standard laryngectomy (group 2) equipped with the Provox(®) 2 voice prostheses were followed up over 2 years. Anamnestic data, documentation of shunt-related or device-related complications, the Provox(®) 2 indwelling time, and standard microbiological procedures of voice prostheses were used for analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 157 prostheses were replaced. No significant difference in mean prosthesis indwelling time (p = .45) was observed between group 1 (116 ± 114 days) and group 2 (129 ± 99 days). Patients with jejunal autograft reconstruction needed prosthesis replacements more frequently within the first 60 days after prosthesis insertion in comparison to patients after standard laryngectomy (p = .007). The main indication for replacement in both groups was the device leakage (group 1: 93.1%, group 2: 92.1%). Prostheses of group 1 were more often colonized with Staphylococcus aureus (p = .027) and Enterobacteriaceae (p = .015).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that, in comparison with patients after standard laryngectomy, patients after jejunal autograft reconstruction have similar shunt-related and device-related complications and prosthesis indwelling times. Therefore, tracheoesophageal voice rehabilitation could be strongly recommended in these patients.

摘要

背景

本前瞻性研究旨在比较喉咽切除术后使用空肠移植重建与标准喉切除术患者,评估分流相关和器械相关并发症以及人工发声器的微生物定植情况。

方法

9 例接受喉咽切除术后空肠移植重建(第 1 组)和 14 例接受标准喉切除术(第 2 组)的患者均使用 Provox®2 人工发声器,随访时间超过 2 年。分析了病史资料、分流相关或器械相关并发症的记录、人工发声器留置时间以及标准微生物程序。

结果

共更换了 157 个人工发声器。第 1 组(116 ± 114 天)和第 2 组(129 ± 99 天)的平均人工发声器留置时间无显著差异(p =.45)。与标准喉切除术患者相比,空肠移植重建患者在插入人工发声器后的前 60 天内需要更频繁地更换人工发声器(p =.007)。两组的主要更换指征均为器械泄漏(第 1 组:93.1%,第 2 组:92.1%)。第 1 组的人工发声器更常定植金黄色葡萄球菌(p =.027)和肠杆菌科(p =.015)。

结论

与标准喉切除术患者相比,空肠移植重建患者的分流相关和器械相关并发症以及人工发声器留置时间相似。因此,强烈建议这些患者进行气管食管语音康复。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验