Brockett C L, Jennings L M, Fisher J
Institute of Medical and Biological Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2011 May;225(5):511-9. doi: 10.1177/2041303310393824.
Unicompartmental knee replacements (UKR) are an option for surgical intervention for the treatment of single-compartment osteoarthritis. The aim of this study was to compare the wear of a low-conformity fixed-bearing UKR with a conforming mobile bearing UKR under two kinematic conditions, to investigate the effect of implant design and kinematics on wear performance in a physiological knee wear simulator. Under both sets of kinematic conditions, the relatively low-conforming fixed UKR showed lower wear, compared with the more conforming anterior-posterior sliding mobile bearing. However, it should be noted that differences in materials between the two designs also contribute to the relative wear performance of the bearings. The combined wear of the medial and lateral bearings of the fixed-bearing UKR as a 'total knee' were significantly reduced compared with a fixed-bearing total knee replacement studied under the same kinematic conditions.
单髁膝关节置换术(UKR)是治疗单髁骨关节炎的一种手术干预选择。本研究的目的是在两种运动学条件下,比较低匹配度固定平台UKR与匹配度良好的活动平台UKR的磨损情况,以研究植入物设计和运动学对生理膝关节磨损模拟器中磨损性能的影响。在两组运动学条件下,与匹配度更好的前后滑动活动平台相比,匹配度相对较低的固定平台UKR磨损更低。然而,应该注意的是,两种设计之间材料的差异也会影响轴承的相对磨损性能。与在相同运动学条件下研究的固定平台全膝关节置换术相比,固定平台UKR的内侧和外侧轴承作为“全膝关节”的联合磨损显著降低。