Brockmeier S J, Fitzgerald Denis, Searle Oliver, Fitzgerald Heather, Grasmeder Mary, Hilbig Silke, Vermiere Katrien, Peterreins Martin, Heydner Susanne, Arnold Wolfgang
Department of Otolaryngology, Technical University Munich, Germany.
Cochlear Implants Int. 2011 Feb;12(1):10-20. doi: 10.1179/146701010X12677899497236.
This study was undertaken to evaluate the musical sounds in cochlear implants (MuSIC) perception test, created to assess the music-listening abilities of cochlear implant (CI) users. Thirty-one unilateral MED-EL COMBI 40+/PULSARCI(100) users and a control group of 67 adults with normal hearing (NH) participated. The MuSIC test comprises six objective and two subjective modules employing approximately 2800 musical files recorded from non-synthesized instruments. A subset was used for comparing CI and NH participants' results. CI and NH participants performed significantly differently on: pitch discrimination, melody discrimination, chord discrimination, instrument detection, and instrument identification. No significant difference in performance was seen on the subtests of rhythm discrimination or dissonance rating and emotion rating. The MuSIC test was found to be a valuable tool for assessing music perception in CI users and NH participants, whether investigating one aspect of music perception in depth or conducting a broad survey of music perception.
本研究旨在评估人工耳蜗音乐感知测试(MuSIC),该测试旨在评估人工耳蜗(CI)使用者的音乐聆听能力。31名单侧使用MED-EL COMBI 40+/PULSAR CI(100)的使用者以及67名听力正常(NH)的成年人组成的对照组参与了研究。MuSIC测试包括六个客观模块和两个主观模块,使用了约2800个从非合成乐器录制的音乐文件。一个子集用于比较CI使用者和NH参与者的结果。CI使用者和NH参与者在以下方面表现出显著差异:音高辨别、旋律辨别、和弦辨别、乐器检测和乐器识别。在节奏辨别、不和谐评级和情感评级的子测试中,表现没有显著差异。结果发现,无论深入研究音乐感知的一个方面还是对音乐感知进行广泛调查,MuSIC测试都是评估CI使用者和NH参与者音乐感知的有价值工具。