Hwa Tiffany P, Wen Christopher Z, Ruckenstein Michael J
Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Apr 3;7(2):116-125. doi: 10.1016/j.wjorl.2021.02.003. eCollection 2021 Apr.
To provide an overview of the current available music assessment tools after cochlear implantation (CI); to report on the utilization of music assessments in the literature; to propose potential future directions in music assessment after CI.
A thorough search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library through October 31, 2020. MeSH search terms, keywords, and phrases included "cochlear implant," "cochlear prosthesis," "auditory prosthesis," "music," "music assessment," "music questionnaire," "music perception," "music enjoyment, and "music experience." Potentially relevant studies were reviewed for inclusion, with particular focus on assessments developed specifically for the cochlear implant population and intended for widespread use.
RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: Six hundred and forty-three studies were screened for relevance to assessment of music experience among cochlear implantees. Eighty-one studies ultimately met criteria for inclusion. There are multiple validated tools for assessment of music experience after cochlear implantation, each of which provide slightly differing insights into the patients' subjective and/or objective post-activation experience. However, no single assessment tool has been adopted into widespread use and thus, much of the literature pertaining to this topic evaluates outcomes non-uniformly, including single-use assessments designed specifically for the study at hand. The lack of a widely accepted universal tool for assessment of music limits our collective understanding the contributory and mitigating factors applicable to current music experience of cochlear implantees, and limits our ability to uniformly evaluate the success of new implant technologies or music training paradigms.
概述目前可用于人工耳蜗植入(CI)后音乐评估的工具;报告文献中音乐评估的应用情况;提出人工耳蜗植入后音乐评估未来可能的发展方向。
截至2020年10月31日,在PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆进行了全面检索。医学主题词检索词、关键词和短语包括“人工耳蜗”“耳蜗假体”“听觉假体”“音乐”“音乐评估”“音乐问卷”“音乐感知”“音乐享受”和“音乐体验”。对潜在相关研究进行了纳入审查,特别关注专门为人工耳蜗植入人群开发并打算广泛使用的评估。
结果/结论:筛选了643项与人工耳蜗植入者音乐体验评估相关的研究。最终有81项研究符合纳入标准。有多种经过验证的工具可用于评估人工耳蜗植入后的音乐体验,每种工具对患者激活后的主观和/或客观体验提供的见解略有不同。然而,没有一种评估工具被广泛采用,因此,许多关于该主题的文献对结果的评估并不统一,包括专门为手头研究设计的一次性评估。缺乏一种被广泛接受的通用音乐评估工具限制了我们对影响人工耳蜗植入者当前音乐体验的促成因素和缓解因素的总体理解,也限制了我们统一评估新植入技术或音乐训练模式成功与否的能力。