• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家退伍军人事务部实践中 HCV 治疗效果的实现存在差距。

Gaps in the achievement of effectiveness of HCV treatment in national VA practice.

机构信息

Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX, United States.

出版信息

J Hepatol. 2012 Feb;56(2):320-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2011.05.032. Epub 2011 Jul 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhep.2011.05.032
PMID:21756855
Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Antiviral treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) has high efficacy rates for achieving sustained viral response (SVR) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (40-80%); however, it can be lower in community-based practice settings. We wanted to determine the effectiveness of HCV treatment in Veterans Administration (VA) hospitals nationwide.

METHODS

Using the nationwide VA HCV Clinical Case Registry (CCR), we examined a cohort of veterans who had HCV viremia between 2000 and 2005 and identified patients who received pegylated-interferon (PEG-INF) and ribavirin. The duration of treatment and proportion of patients completing treatment was calculated. The effectiveness of treatment was measured as the proportion of patients who achieved SVR (negative viremia at least 12 weeks after the end of treatment) in the entire cohort, and among patients who initiated and completed treatment.

RESULTS

We identified 99,166 patients with HCV viremia. Of those, 11.6% received PEG-INF with ribavirin and 6.4% completed treatment. Contraindications were present in 57.2% of the patients that did not receive treatment. SVR was documented in 39.9% and 58.3% of patients who completed treatment; 23.6% and 50.6% of patients who initiated treatment; and 3.9% and 11.2% of the entire HCV cohort for genotype 1 or 4 and 2 or 3, respectively. Overall, only 3.5% of the entire HCV viremic cohort had a documented SVR.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment effectiveness for HCV is low. In addition to fixed factors, such as race and virus genotype, the drop in effectiveness is due to low rates of antiviral treatment initiation and treatment completion.

摘要

背景与目的

在随机对照试验(RCT)中,抗病毒治疗丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)的持续病毒学应答(SVR)率很高(40-80%);然而,在社区实践环境中可能较低。我们想确定全国退伍军人事务部(VA)医院 HCV 治疗的效果。

方法

我们使用全国 VA HCV 临床病例登记处(CCR),检查了一组在 2000 年至 2005 年间患有 HCV 病毒血症的退伍军人,并确定了接受聚乙二醇干扰素(PEG-INF)和利巴韦林治疗的患者。计算了治疗的持续时间和完成治疗的患者比例。治疗效果通过整个队列中实现 SVR(治疗结束后至少 12 周病毒阴性)的患者比例以及开始和完成治疗的患者比例来衡量。

结果

我们确定了 99166 例 HCV 病毒血症患者。其中,11.6%接受 PEG-INF 联合利巴韦林治疗,6.4%完成治疗。未接受治疗的患者中有 57.2%存在禁忌症。完成治疗的患者中,SVR 记录在案的比例分别为 39.9%和 58.3%;开始治疗的患者分别为 23.6%和 50.6%;基因型 1 或 4 和 2 或 3 的整个 HCV 队列分别为 3.9%和 11.2%。总的来说,只有 3.5%的整个 HCV 病毒血症患者有记录的 SVR。

结论

HCV 的治疗效果较低。除了种族和病毒基因型等固定因素外,治疗效果下降还归因于抗病毒治疗开始和完成率低。

相似文献

1
Gaps in the achievement of effectiveness of HCV treatment in national VA practice.国家退伍军人事务部实践中 HCV 治疗效果的实现存在差距。
J Hepatol. 2012 Feb;56(2):320-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2011.05.032. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
2
Rates and predictors of response to anti-viral treatment for hepatitis C virus in HIV/HCV co-infection in a nationwide study of 619 patients.在一项针对 619 名患者的全国性研究中,评估了 HIV/HCV 共感染患者接受抗病毒治疗丙型肝炎病毒的反应率及其预测因素。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Dec;38(11-12):1373-84. doi: 10.1111/apt.12524. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
3
Predictors of response of US veterans to treatment for the hepatitis C virus.美国退伍军人丙型肝炎病毒治疗反应的预测因素。
Hepatology. 2007 Jul;46(1):37-47. doi: 10.1002/hep.21662.
4
Retreatment of hepatitis C with consensus interferon and ribavirin after nonresponse or relapse to pegylated interferon and ribavirin: a national VA clinical practice study.聚乙二醇干扰素联合利巴韦林治疗失败后的慢性丙型肝炎患者应用普通干扰素联合利巴韦林挽救治疗:一项全国性退伍军人事务部临床实践研究。
Dig Dis Sci. 2011 Aug;56(8):2439-48. doi: 10.1007/s10620-011-1746-3. Epub 2011 Jun 2.
5
Peginterferon alfa and ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C in patients eligible for shortened treatment, re-treatment or in HCV/HIV co-infection: a systematic review and economic evaluation.聚乙二醇干扰素 α 和利巴韦林治疗适合缩短疗程、再治疗或合并 HCV/HIV 感染的慢性丙型肝炎患者:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Apr;15(17):i-xii, 1-210. doi: 10.3310/hta15170.
6
[Durability of a sustained virologic response in combination therapy with interferon/peginterferon and ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C].[干扰素/聚乙二醇干扰素与利巴韦林联合治疗慢性丙型肝炎的持续病毒学应答的持久性]
Korean J Hepatol. 2009 Mar;15(1):70-9. doi: 10.3350/kjhep.2009.15.1.70.
7
[Efficacy of pegylated interferon alpha-2a and ribavirin treatment in chronic hepatitis C patients depends on various baseline parameters and early viral kinetics].聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a联合利巴韦林治疗慢性丙型肝炎患者的疗效取决于多种基线参数和早期病毒动力学
Klin Mikrobiol Infekc Lek. 2008 Apr;14(2):67-73.
8
Efficacy of 24 weeks treatment with peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C infected with genotype 1 and low pretreatment viremia.聚乙二醇干扰素α-2b联合利巴韦林治疗24周对基因1型感染且治疗前病毒血症水平较低的慢性丙型肝炎患者的疗效。
J Hepatol. 2006 Jan;44(1):97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.10.003. Epub 2005 Nov 7.
9
Efficacy of pegylated interferon alfa-2a or alfa-2b in combination with ribavirin in the treatment of chronic hepatitis caused by hepatitis C virus genotype 1b.聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a或α-2b联合利巴韦林治疗丙型肝炎病毒1b型所致慢性肝炎的疗效
Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2011 Dec;121(12):434-9.
10
Predictive value of early virological response to treatment with different interferon-based regimens plus ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C.不同基于干扰素的治疗方案联合利巴韦林治疗慢性丙型肝炎患者时早期病毒学应答的预测价值
New Microbiol. 2005 Jan;28(1):13-21.

引用本文的文献

1
Access to Hepatitis C Treatment during and after Incarceration in New Jersey, United States: A Qualitative Study.美国新泽西州监禁期间及之后的丙型肝炎治疗可及性:一项定性研究
Life (Basel). 2023 Apr 17;13(4):1033. doi: 10.3390/life13041033.
2
Efficacy of direct-acting antiviral therapy for hepatitis C viral infection. Real-life experience in Bahrain.丙型肝炎病毒感染直接抗病毒治疗的疗效。巴林的实际经验。
Hepat Med. 2019 May 13;11:69-78. doi: 10.2147/HMER.S190967. eCollection 2019.
3
Assessing testing rates for viral hepatitis B and C by general practitioners in Flanders, Belgium: a registry-based study.
评估比利时佛兰德斯地区全科医生对乙型和丙型病毒性肝炎的检测率:一项基于登记的研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 9;9(5):e026464. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026464.
4
Identifying and Treating Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.非酒精性脂肪性肝病的识别与治疗
Fed Pract. 2019 Jan;36(1):20-29.
5
Impact of new DAA therapy on real clinical practice: a multicenter region-wide cohort study.新型直接抗病毒药物治疗对真实临床实践的影响:一项多中心、全地区范围的队列研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2018 May 16;18(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3125-6.
6
Barriers to care for chronic hepatitis C in the direct-acting antiviral era: a single-centre experience.直接抗病毒药物时代慢性丙型肝炎的治疗障碍:单中心经验
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2017 Dec 20;4(1):e000181. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2017-000181. eCollection 2017.
7
The continuum of hepatitis C care for criminal justice involved adults in the DAA era: a retrospective cohort study demonstrating limited treatment uptake and inconsistent linkage to community-based care.直接抗病毒药物(DAA)时代针对涉刑事司法的成年丙肝患者的连续护理:一项回顾性队列研究表明治疗接受度有限且与社区护理的联系不一致
Health Justice. 2017 Oct 30;5(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40352-017-0055-0.
8
Real-life results of sofosbuvir based therapy in chronic hepatitis C -naïve and -experienced patients in Egypt.索磷布韦治疗埃及初治和经治慢性丙型肝炎患者的真实疗效
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 5;12(10):e0184654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184654. eCollection 2017.
9
Hepatitis C virus-related complications are increasing in women veterans: A national cohort study.丙型肝炎病毒相关并发症在女性退伍军人中日益增多:一项全国队列研究。
J Viral Hepat. 2017 Nov;24(11):955-965. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12728. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
10
Estimating the cost-effectiveness of daclatasvir + sofosbuvir versus sofosbuvir + ribavirin for patients with genotype 3 hepatitis C virus.评估对于丙型肝炎病毒3型患者,达卡他韦+索磷布韦对比索磷布韦+利巴韦林的成本效益。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2017 Jul 21;15:15. doi: 10.1186/s12962-017-0077-4. eCollection 2017.