Kim Sung Eun, Lee Han Chu, Kim Kang Mo, Lim Young-Suk, Chung Young-Hwa, Lee Yung Sang, Suh Dong Jin
Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Korean J Hepatol. 2011 Jun;17(2):113-9. doi: 10.3350/kjhep.2011.17.2.113.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system is logical for the staging and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) because it was based on survival data. This study evaluated the applicability of the BCLC staging system and reasons for divergence from BCLC-recommended treatments in Korean HCC patients.
One hundred and sixty consecutive HCC patients were prospectively enrolled. Treatments were generally recommended according to the guideline of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, but patients were also informed about alternative treatments. The final decision was made with patient agreement, and was based on the doctor's preferences when a patient was unable to reach a decision.
There were 2 (1%), 101 (64%), 20 (12.5%), 34 (21.5%), and 3 (1%) patients with very early-, early-, intermediate-, advanced-, and terminal-stage disease, respectively. Only 64 patients (40%) were treated according to BCLC recommendations. The treatment deviated from BCLC recommendations in 68% (69/101) and 79% (27/34) of patients with early and advanced stage, respectively. The main causes of deviation were refusal to undergo surgery, the presence of an indeterminate malignancy nodule, the absence of a suitable donor, or financial problems.
Donor shortage, financial problems, the relatively limited efficacy of molecular targeting agents, and the presence of an indeterminate nodule were the main causes of deviation from BCLC recommendations. Even after excluding cases in which decisions were made by patient preference, only 66% of the HCC patients were treated according to BCLC recommendations. Treatment guidelines that reflect the Korean situation are mandatory for HCC patients.
背景/目的:巴塞罗那临床肝癌(BCLC)分期系统对于肝细胞癌(HCC)的分期和治疗具有合理性,因为它基于生存数据。本研究评估了BCLC分期系统在韩国HCC患者中的适用性以及与BCLC推荐治疗方案存在差异的原因。
前瞻性纳入160例连续的HCC患者。治疗方案通常根据美国肝病研究协会的指南推荐,但也向患者告知了替代治疗方案。最终决策经患者同意后做出,当患者无法做出决定时,则基于医生的偏好。
分别有2例(1%)、101例(64%)、20例(12.5%)、34例(21.5%)和3例(1%)患者处于极早期、早期、中期、晚期和终末期疾病阶段。只有64例患者(40%)接受了符合BCLC推荐的治疗。早期和晚期患者中分别有68%(69/101)和79%(27/34)的治疗方案偏离了BCLC推荐。偏离的主要原因是拒绝手术、存在不确定的恶性结节、缺乏合适的供体或经济问题。
供体短缺、经济问题、分子靶向药物相对有限的疗效以及存在不确定结节是偏离BCLC推荐的主要原因。即使排除根据患者偏好做出决策的病例,仍只有66%的HCC患者接受了符合BCLC推荐的治疗。对于HCC患者,制定反映韩国情况治疗指南是必要的。