• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超越工程师伦理的工程伦理。

Engineering ethics beyond engineers' ethics.

机构信息

Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Escola d'Enginyeria, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Catalunya, Spain.

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Mar;19(1):179-87. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9293-z. Epub 2011 Jul 15.

DOI:10.1007/s11948-011-9293-z
PMID:21761243
Abstract

Engineering ethics is usually focused on engineers' ethics, engineers acting as individuals. Certainly, these professionals play a central role in the matter, but engineers are not a singularity inside engineering; they exist and operate as a part of a complex network of mutual relationships between many other people, organizations and groups. When engineering ethics and engineers' ethics are taken as one and the same thing the paradigm of the ethical engineer which prevails is that of the heroic engineer, a certain model of the ideal engineer: someone both quite individualistic and strong enough to deal with all the moral challenges that could arise. We argue that this is not the best approach, at least today in our interrelated world. We have achieved a high degree of independence from nature by means of technology. In exchange for this autonomy we have become increasingly tied up with very complex systems to which we constantly delegate new tasks and powers. Concerns about safety keep growing everywhere due to the fact that now we have a sensitive awareness of the huge amount of power we are both consuming and deploying, thus, new forms of dialogue and consensus have to be incorporated at different levels, in different forums and at different times. Within these democratic channels of participation not just the needs and interests, but also the responsibilities and mutual commitments of all parties should be taken into account.

摘要

工程伦理学通常关注工程师的伦理道德,即工程师作为个体的行为。诚然,这些专业人员在这一问题中扮演着核心角色,但工程师并不是工程内部的一个奇点;他们作为相互关系复杂网络中的一部分而存在和运作,这一网络涉及许多其他人、组织和团体。当工程伦理学和工程师的伦理学被视为同一事物时,占主导地位的伦理工程师范式是英雄工程师范式,即理想工程师的某种模式:既非常个人主义又足够强大,足以应对可能出现的所有道德挑战。我们认为,至少在我们这个相互关联的世界中,这不是最好的方法。我们通过技术实现了与自然的高度独立。作为这种自主权的交换,我们与非常复杂的系统越来越紧密地联系在一起,我们不断将新的任务和权力委托给这些系统。由于我们现在对自己所消耗和部署的巨大权力有了敏感的认识,因此,各地对安全的担忧与日俱增,这就需要在不同层次、不同论坛和不同时间纳入新的对话和共识形式。在这些参与的民主渠道中,不仅要考虑到各方的需求和利益,还要考虑到各方的责任和相互承诺。

相似文献

1
Engineering ethics beyond engineers' ethics.超越工程师伦理的工程伦理。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Mar;19(1):179-87. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9293-z. Epub 2011 Jul 15.
2
When Ethics is a Technical Matter: Engineers' Strategic Appeal to Ethical Considerations in Advocating for System Integrity.当伦理成为技术问题:工程师在倡导系统完整性时将伦理考虑作为战略诉求。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2021 Jul 9;27(4):46. doi: 10.1007/s11948-021-00324-7.
3
Engineering ethics and identity: emerging initiatives in comparative perspective.工程伦理与身份认同:比较视角下的新举措
Sci Eng Ethics. 2007 Dec;13(4):463-87. doi: 10.1007/s11948-007-9040-7. Epub 2007 Nov 21.
4
Engineers and Active Responsibility.工程师与积极责任。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Aug;21(4):925-39. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9571-7. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
5
Understanding Engineers' Responsibilities: A Prerequisite to Designing Engineering Education : Commentary on "Educating Engineers for the Public Good Through International Internships: Evidence from a Case Study at Universitat Politècnica de València".理解工程师的责任:设计工程教育的前提——对“通过国际实习为公益培养工程师:巴伦西亚理工大学的案例研究证据”的评论
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Dec;25(6):1817-1820. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9949-4. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
6
Engineers' Responsibilities for Global Electronic Waste: Exploring Engineering Student Writing Through a Care Ethics Lens.工程师对全球电子垃圾的责任:通过关怀伦理视角探索工科学生的写作
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Apr;23(2):591-622. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9781-2. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
7
The use of moral dilemmas for teaching agricultural engineers.运用道德困境来培养农业工程师。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2006 Apr;12(2):327-34.
8
The application of ethics to engineering and the engineer's moral responsibility: perspectives for a research agenda.伦理学在工程中的应用以及工程师的道德责任:研究议程的视角
Sci Eng Ethics. 2001 Jul;7(3):415-28. doi: 10.1007/s11948-001-0063-1.
9
Engineers' Moral Responsibility: A Confucian Perspective.工程师的道德责任:儒家视角。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Feb;26(1):233-253. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00093-4. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
10
Professional Ethics of Software Engineers: An Ethical Framework.软件工程师的职业道德:一种道德框架。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Apr;22(2):417-34. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9665-x. Epub 2015 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
What Do We Teach to Engineering Students: Embedded Ethics, Morality, and Politics.我们应该教给工科学生什么:嵌入式伦理、道德和政治。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 Feb 19;30(1):7. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00469-1.
2
"In Our Own Little World": Invisibility of the Social and Ethical Dimension of Engineering Among Undergraduate Students.“在我们自己的小世界里”:本科生中工程的社会和伦理维度的不明显性。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2021 Dec 9;27(6):74. doi: 10.1007/s11948-021-00355-0.
3
A Multi-level Review of Engineering Ethics Education: Towards a Socio-technical Orientation of Engineering Education for Ethics.

本文引用的文献

1
Esssential ethics--embedding ethics into an engineering curriculum.基础伦理——将伦理融入工程学课程
Sci Eng Ethics. 2004 Apr;10(2):369-81. doi: 10.1007/s11948-004-0033-5.
2
What's philosophically interesting about engineering ethics?工程伦理在哲学层面有哪些有趣之处?
Sci Eng Ethics. 2003 Jul;9(3):353-61. doi: 10.1007/s11948-003-0032-y.
工程伦理教育的多层次审视:迈向工程伦理教育的社会技术取向。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2021 Aug 24;27(5):60. doi: 10.1007/s11948-021-00333-6.
4
Professional Ethics of Software Engineers: An Ethical Framework.软件工程师的职业道德:一种道德框架。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Apr;22(2):417-34. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9665-x. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
5
Second-Guessing Scientists and Engineers: Post Hoc Criticism and the Reform of Practice in Green Chemistry and Engineering.质疑科学家和工程师:事后批评与绿色化学和工程实践的改革
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Oct;21(5):1217-40. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9585-1. Epub 2014 Sep 14.
6
Engineers and Active Responsibility.工程师与积极责任。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Aug;21(4):925-39. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9571-7. Epub 2014 Jul 9.