Lozano J Félix, Palau-Salvador Guillermo, Gozálvez Vincent, Boni Alejandra
Dpto. Proyectos de Ingeniería, ETSII, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, España.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2006 Apr;12(2):327-34.
Agricultural engineers' jobs are especially related to sustainability and earth life issues. They usually work with plants or animals, and the aim of their work is often linked to producing food to allow people to improve their quality of life. Taking into account this dual function, the moral requirements of their day-to-day professional practice are arguably greater than those of other professions. Agricultural engineers can develop their ability to live up to this professional responsibility by receiving ethical training during their university studies, not only by taking courses specifically devoted to ethics, but also by having to deal with moral questions that are integrated into their technical courses through a program of Ethics Across the Curriculum (EAC). The authors feel that a suitable pedagogical technique for achieving this goal is the use of moral dilemmas, following Kohlberg's theory of levels of morality (1981), with the final objective of attaining a post-conventional level. This paper examines the possibilities and limitations of using moral dilemmas as a pedagogical technique for training agricultural engineers. The cases, discussions, and evaluation used in the Agricultural Engineering Department of the Technical University of Valencia (Spain) are also presented.
农业工程师的工作尤其与可持续发展和地球生命问题相关。他们通常与植物或动物打交道,其工作目标往往与生产食物以改善人们的生活质量有关。考虑到这一双重功能,他们日常专业实践中的道德要求可以说比其他职业更高。农业工程师可以通过在大学学习期间接受道德培训来培养履行这一职业责任的能力,这不仅包括修读专门的伦理学课程,还包括通过跨课程伦理(EAC)项目处理融入其技术课程中的道德问题。作者认为,实现这一目标的合适教学技巧是运用道德困境,遵循科尔伯格的道德发展阶段理论(1981年),最终目标是达到后习俗水平。本文探讨了将道德困境作为培训农业工程师的教学技巧的可能性和局限性。还介绍了西班牙瓦伦西亚理工大学农业工程系所使用的案例、讨论和评估。