Suppr超能文献

评估欺骗研究中实验后询问的充分性以及促进参与者诚实的因素。

Assessing the adequacy of postexperimental inquiries in deception research and the factors that promote participant honesty.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, East Tennessee State University, P.O. Box 70649, Johnson City, TN 37614, USA.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2012 Mar;44(1):24-40. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0132-6.

Abstract

The primary aim of this research was to assess the adequacy of postexperimental inquiries (PEI) used in deception research, as well as to examine whether mood state, reward, or administering the PEI as a face-to-face interview or computer survey impacts participants' willingness to divulge suspicion or knowledge about a study. We also sought to determine why participants are not always forthcoming on the PEI. Study 1 examined how frequently PEIs are included in research and found that most researchers employing deception do use a PEI. Studies 2 and 3 showed that participants are often unwilling to divulge suspicion or awareness of deception or to admit to having prior knowledge about a study, though offering a reward and completing the PEI on a computer modestly improved awareness and admission rates. Study 4 indicated several reasons why participants may not reveal suspicion or knowledge about a study on the PEI.

摘要

这项研究的主要目的是评估欺骗研究中使用的事后询问(PEI)的充分性,并研究情绪状态、奖励或采用面对面访谈或计算机调查形式的 PEI 是否会影响参与者透露对研究的怀疑或了解的意愿。我们还试图确定为什么参与者并不总是在 PEI 上坦诚相告。研究 1 考察了 PEI 在研究中被包含的频率,发现大多数使用欺骗手段的研究人员确实使用了 PEI。研究 2 和 3 表明,参与者通常不愿意透露对欺骗或对某项研究的意识,或者承认对某项研究有先验知识,尽管提供奖励并在计算机上完成 PEI 可以适度提高意识和承认率。研究 4 指出了参与者可能不在 PEI 上透露对研究的怀疑或了解的几个原因。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验