Department of Psychology, East Tennessee State University, P.O. Box 70649, Johnson City, TN 37614, USA.
Behav Res Methods. 2012 Mar;44(1):24-40. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0132-6.
The primary aim of this research was to assess the adequacy of postexperimental inquiries (PEI) used in deception research, as well as to examine whether mood state, reward, or administering the PEI as a face-to-face interview or computer survey impacts participants' willingness to divulge suspicion or knowledge about a study. We also sought to determine why participants are not always forthcoming on the PEI. Study 1 examined how frequently PEIs are included in research and found that most researchers employing deception do use a PEI. Studies 2 and 3 showed that participants are often unwilling to divulge suspicion or awareness of deception or to admit to having prior knowledge about a study, though offering a reward and completing the PEI on a computer modestly improved awareness and admission rates. Study 4 indicated several reasons why participants may not reveal suspicion or knowledge about a study on the PEI.
这项研究的主要目的是评估欺骗研究中使用的事后询问(PEI)的充分性,并研究情绪状态、奖励或采用面对面访谈或计算机调查形式的 PEI 是否会影响参与者透露对研究的怀疑或了解的意愿。我们还试图确定为什么参与者并不总是在 PEI 上坦诚相告。研究 1 考察了 PEI 在研究中被包含的频率,发现大多数使用欺骗手段的研究人员确实使用了 PEI。研究 2 和 3 表明,参与者通常不愿意透露对欺骗或对某项研究的意识,或者承认对某项研究有先验知识,尽管提供奖励并在计算机上完成 PEI 可以适度提高意识和承认率。研究 4 指出了参与者可能不在 PEI 上透露对研究的怀疑或了解的几个原因。