Suppr超能文献

癫痫管理中的当前挑战。

Current challenges in the management of epilepsy.

机构信息

University of Cincinnati College of Medicine and Epilepsy Center at UC Neuroscience Institute, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA.

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2011 Jun;17 Suppl 7:S195-203.

Abstract

A series of conceptual reconsiderations and therapeutic advances in recent years has resulted in meaningful changes in the classification, diagnosis, and treatment of epilepsy. The first step in evaluation of the person with epilepsy is determining whether the seizures are partial or generalized in onset; this determination will guide further evaluation and is mandatory in choosing an antiepileptic drug (AED). With 12 new AEDs and 1 device approved for use in epilepsy by the US Food and Drug Administration since 1993, the choice of AED has become more complex and it is impossible to predict whether a patient will respond favorably to a drug based on clinical features or clinical laboratory results. AEDs have many different mechanisms of action, but there does not seem to be a strong base of evidence to demonstrate that AED choice should be based on mechanism of action. Yet, a new secondary analysis of data from clinical trials of the new AED lacosamide suggests that combining this AED with another AED that has minimal or no activity at the sodium channel may lead to better tolerability and efficacy. The new AEDs have been tested in randomized controlled trials and compared with placebo; however, there are few head-to-head trials assessing the efficacy of various AEDs, and none of them provide evidence of a clear first choice drug or first add-on drug. Adverse effect profiles of the new generation of AEDs generally show better overall tolerability, but the choice of AED must be individualized (often based on comorbidities) because the adverse effect profiles of the newer AEDs differ widely. One area where the new AEDs consistently outperform the older AEDs is pharmacokinetic profile. Three new AEDs have no hepatic metabolism or protein binding, and others have minimal drug-drug interactions. Ultimately, selection of an appropriate agent involves matching a patient to a medication, or combination of medications, with the best record of efficacy while avoiding issues of tolerability and unwanted drug interactions (specifically tied to the needs of a given patient). Despite major advances in AED development, approximately one-third of people with epilepsy will have incomplete control of seizures no matter which AED is used alone or in combination, emphasizing the need for more effective AEDs. Patients with medication-resistant epilepsy may be candidates for epilepsy surgery, a highly effective treatment that is underutilized in this population.

摘要

近年来,一系列概念上的重新考虑和治疗进展导致了癫痫的分类、诊断和治疗发生了有意义的变化。评估癫痫患者的第一步是确定发作是部分性还是全身性发作;这一确定将指导进一步的评估,并对选择抗癫痫药物(AED)是强制性的。自 1993 年以来,美国食品和药物管理局批准了 12 种新的 AED 和 1 种治疗设备用于治疗癫痫,AED 的选择变得更加复杂,并且不可能根据临床特征或临床实验室结果预测患者对药物的反应是否良好。AED 有许多不同的作用机制,但似乎没有强有力的证据表明 AED 的选择应该基于作用机制。然而,对新型 AED 拉科酰胺临床试验数据的二次分析表明,将这种 AED 与另一种在钠通道上几乎没有或没有活性的 AED 联合使用可能会提高耐受性和疗效。新的 AED 已经在随机对照试验中进行了测试,并与安慰剂进行了比较;然而,几乎没有头对头的试验来评估各种 AED 的疗效,而且没有一种试验提供了明确的首选药物或首选附加药物的证据。新一代 AED 的不良反应谱通常显示出更好的总体耐受性,但 AED 的选择必须个体化(通常基于合并症),因为新型 AED 的不良反应谱差异很大。新型 AED 始终优于旧型 AED 的一个领域是药代动力学特征。三种新型 AED 没有肝代谢或蛋白结合,其他 AED 药物的药物相互作用也很少。最终,选择合适的药物涉及将患者与具有最佳疗效记录的药物或药物组合相匹配,同时避免耐受性问题和不必要的药物相互作用(特别是与特定患者的需求相关)。尽管在 AED 开发方面取得了重大进展,但无论单独使用哪种 AED 或联合使用哪种 AED,大约三分之一的癫痫患者的癫痫发作都无法得到完全控制,这强调了需要更有效的 AED。药物难治性癫痫患者可能是癫痫手术的候选者,这种治疗方法在该人群中未得到充分利用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验