SEA Environmental Decisions, Ltd., 1 South Cottages, The Ford, Little Hadham, Hertfordshire SG11 2AT, UK.
Sci Total Environ. 2012 Jan 15;415:9-30. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.05.060. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
There is a growing trend to include a consideration of ecosystem services, the benefits that people obtain from ecosystems, within decision frameworks. Not more than a decade ago, sediment management efforts were largely site-specific and held little attention except in terms of managing contaminant inputs and addressing sediments as a nuisance at commercial ports and harbors. Sediments figure extensively in the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment; however, contaminated sediment is not the dominant concern. Rather, the focus is on land and water use and management on the landscape scale, which can profoundly affect soil and sediment quality, quantity and fate. Habitat change and loss, due to changes in sediment inputs, whether reductions (resulting in the loss of beaches, storm protection, nutrient inputs, etc.) or increases (resulting in lake, reservoir and wetland infilling, coral reef smothering, etc.); eutrophication and reductions in nutrient inputs, and disturbance due to development and fishing practices are considered major drivers, with significant consequences for biodiversity and the provision and resilience of ecosystem functions and services. As a mobile connecting medium between various parts of the ecosystem via the hydrocycle, sediments both contaminated and uncontaminated, play both positive and negative roles in the viability and sustainability of social, economic, and ecological objectives. How these roles are interpreted depends upon whether sediment status (defined in terms of sediment quality, quantity, location and transport) is appropriate to the needs of a given endpoint; understanding and managing the dynamic interactions of sediment status on a diverse range of endpoints at the landscape or watershed scale should be the focus of sediment management. This paper seeks to provide a language and conceptual framework upon which sediment-ecosystem regional assessments (SEcoRAs) can be developed in support of that goal.
目前,在决策框架中纳入生态系统服务(即人们从生态系统中获得的效益)的考量,已成为一种趋势。就在十几年前,沉积物管理工作主要还是针对具体地点的,除了在管理污染物输入和将沉积物视为商业港口和码头的一种公害方面外,很少受到关注。沉积物在千年生态系统评估中占有重要地位;然而,受污染的沉积物并不是主要关注点。相反,重点是在景观尺度上进行土地和水资源利用和管理,这会深刻影响土壤和沉积物的质量、数量和归宿。由于沉积物输入的变化,包括减少(导致海滩、风暴防护、养分输入等的损失)或增加(导致湖泊、水库和湿地淤塞、珊瑚礁窒息等),从而导致生境变化和丧失;富营养化和养分输入减少,以及开发和渔业活动造成的干扰,都被认为是主要驱动因素,对生物多样性以及生态系统功能和服务的提供和恢复能力都有重大影响。沉积物作为通过水文循环连接生态系统各部分的移动中介,无论是受污染的还是未受污染的沉积物,在社会、经济和生态目标的可行性和可持续性方面都发挥着积极和消极的作用。这些作用的解释取决于沉积物状况(根据沉积物质量、数量、位置和运输来定义)是否适合给定终点的需要;在景观或流域尺度上,理解和管理沉积物状况对各种终点的动态相互作用,应该成为沉积物管理的重点。本文旨在提供一种语言和概念框架,以便能够在此基础上开展沉积物-生态系统区域评估(SEcoRAs),以支持这一目标。