Endodontic Department, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Misr International University, Cairo, Egypt.
J Endod. 2011 Aug;37(8):1143-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.03.036. Epub 2011 May 17.
The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of the cutting ability of two different instruments, concerning changes in the dentin thickness removed and root canal volume, by using multislice computed tomography scanning.
Thirty single-rooted mandibular premolars were divided into two equal groups according to the preparation system used: the twisted file (TF) and ProTaper (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Swizerland). Dentin thickness along the whole length of the root canal and canal volume were measured before and after instrumentation by using multislice computed tomography scanning and image analysis software.
ProTaper removed significantly more dentin from the mesiodistal and buccolingual directions of the root canal than the TF (P < .05). No significant difference was recorded for the changes in root canal volume between the two systems (P > .05).
The TF system was found to cut dentin efficiently with more uniform cutting than ProTaper system.
本研究的目的是通过使用多层 CT 扫描来比较两种不同器械的切削能力,即根管内牙本质去除量和根管容积的变化。
将 30 颗下颌前磨牙按使用的预备系统分为两组:扭转镍钛锉(TF)和 ProTaper(Dentsply Maillefer,Ballaigues,瑞士)。使用多层 CT 扫描和图像分析软件,在器械预备前后测量根管全长的牙本质厚度和根管容积。
ProTaper 组在颊舌向和近远中向去除的牙本质明显多于 TF 组(P <.05)。两种系统之间根管容积的变化无显著差异(P >.05)。
TF 系统的切削效率高,牙本质切削更均匀。