Instituto Nacional del Carbón (INCAR-CSIC), Francisco Pintado Fé, 26, 33011 Oviedo, Spain.
Chemosphere. 2011 Oct;85(4):565-70. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.06.081. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
This paper evaluates the speciation and partitioning of mercury in two Spanish pulverised coal combustion power plants (PP1 and PP2), equipped with wet limestone-based flue gas desulphurisation facilities (FGD) operating with forced oxidation and re-circulation of FGD water streams. These plants are fed with coal (PP1) and coal/pet-coke blends (PP2) with different mercury contents. The behaviour, partitioning and speciation of Hg were found to be similar during the combustion processes but different in the FGD systems of the two power plants. A high proportion (86-88%) of Hg escaped the electrostatic precipitator in gaseous form, Hg2+ being the predominant mercury species (68-86%) to enter the FGD. At this point, a relatively high total Hg retention (72% and 65%) was achieved in the PP1 and PP2 (2007) FGD facilities respectively. However, during the second sampling campaign for PP2 (2008), the mercury removal achieved by the FGD was much lower (26%). Lab-scale tests point to liquid/gas ratio as the main parameter affecting oxidised mercury capture in the scrubber. The partitioning of the gaseous mercury reaching the FGD system in the wastes and by-products differed. In the low mercury input power plant (PP1) most of the mercury (67%) was associated with the FGD gypsum. Moreover in PP2 a significant proportion of the gaseous mercury reaching the FGD system remained in the aqueous phase (45%) in the 2007 sampling campaign while most of it escaped in 2008 (74%). This may be attributed to the scrubber operating conditions and the different composition and chemistry of the scrubber solution probably due to the use of an additive.
本文评估了西班牙两座煤粉燃烧发电厂(PP1 和 PP2)中汞的形态和分配,这两座电厂均配备了湿法石灰石烟气脱硫装置(FGD),采用强制氧化和 FGD 水再循环工艺。这些电厂使用的煤(PP1)和煤/石油焦混合物(PP2)汞含量不同。研究发现,汞在燃烧过程中的行为、分配和形态相似,但在这两座电厂的 FGD 系统中却不同。大部分汞(86-88%)以气态形式从静电除尘器逸出,Hg2+是进入 FGD 的主要汞形态(68-86%)。在这一点上,PP1 和 PP2(2007 年)FGD 设施分别实现了相对较高的总汞保留率(72%和 65%)。然而,在 PP2 的第二次采样(2008 年)中,FGD 的汞去除率要低得多(26%)。实验室规模的测试表明,气液比是影响吸收塔中氧化汞捕集的主要参数。到达 FGD 系统的气态汞在废物和副产品中的分配不同。在汞输入量较低的电厂(PP1)中,大部分汞(67%)与 FGD 石膏结合。此外,在 PP2 中,大部分气态汞(74%)在 2008 年逸出,而在 2007 年采样时,大部分气态汞(45%)仍留在 FGD 系统的水相中。这可能归因于吸收塔的运行条件以及吸收塔溶液的不同组成和化学性质,这可能是由于添加剂的使用。