Cord Mary T, Surr Rauna K, Walden Brian E, Dittberner Andrew B
Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Am J Audiol. 2011 Dec;20(2):111-22. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2011/10-0035). Epub 2011 Jul 15.
To determine whether an asymmetry between ears for speech understanding in noise was related to performance with, or preference for, 1 of 2 asymmetric microphone fittings in which omnidirectional processing was provided to 1 ear and directional processing to the other.
Twenty-eight adults with symmetric sensorineural hearing impairment were recruited from the clinic population. Sixteen individuals had symmetric hearing-in-noise ability between their right and left ears, and 12 participants had an asymmetry for speech understanding in noise between ears. A repeated measures design was used. Interactions between various microphone fittings and speech signal locations in noise were assessed in the laboratory. In addition, the listeners with asymmetry between ears for hearing in noise completed a field trial comparing the 2 fittings in everyday listening situations.
Laboratory testing resulted in different patterns of performance for the 2 groups. Field trial results revealed that participants generally noticed little difference between the 2 fittings in everyday life and did not express a strong preference for 1 fitting over the other.
An asymmetry between ears for speech understanding in noise did not result in preference for 1 asymmetric fitting over the other in everyday listening situations.
确定在噪声环境下双耳言语理解能力的不对称性是否与两种不对称麦克风佩戴方式(其中一个耳朵采用全向处理,另一个耳朵采用指向性处理)中的一种佩戴方式的表现或偏好有关。
从临床人群中招募了28名患有对称性感音神经性听力损失的成年人。16名个体双耳在噪声环境下的听力能力对称,12名参与者双耳在噪声环境下的言语理解能力存在不对称。采用重复测量设计。在实验室中评估了各种麦克风佩戴方式与噪声中言语信号位置之间的相互作用。此外,双耳在噪声环境下听力不对称的听众完成了一项现场试验,比较了两种佩戴方式在日常聆听环境中的效果。
实验室测试得出两组不同的表现模式。现场试验结果显示,参与者在日常生活中通常很少注意到两种佩戴方式之间的差异,也没有表现出对其中一种佩戴方式的强烈偏好。
在日常聆听环境中,双耳在噪声环境下的言语理解能力不对称并不会导致对一种不对称佩戴方式比另一种更偏好。